Ir al contenido

Informe de conformidad

El activo diferencial de phonometry no es la lista de funcionalidades sino la prueba que hay detrás: cada métrica se implementa a partir del texto de la norma que la rige, y un informe numérico de conformidad fija cada comprobación a una norma, una cláusula o tabla, el valor esperado normativo y el valor que la librería calcula realmente, con la desviación y un veredicto de pasa/no pasa.

El informe es un documento autogenerado que la CI regenera en cada pull request (la build falla si se desincroniza del código), de modo que siempre está en sincronía con la librería publicada. Aquí abajo se reproduce entero, trasplantado tal cual en tiempo de compilación desde docs/CONFORMANCE.md.

  • Clases de filtro: el veredicto de clase IEC 61260-1:2014 por arquitectura de filtro, con la atenuación relativa medida en la banda determinante, el límite de clase 1 que debe superar y el margen en dB.
  • Ponderaciones frecuenciales: desviaciones de A/C (IEC 61672-1 Tabla 3) y G (ISO 7196 A.3) respecto a las curvas nominales, juzgadas en la frecuencia determinante con la banda de tolerancia aplicable y el margen.
  • Una tabla de conformidad por dominio (niveles, psicoacústica, acústica de salas y de la edificación, potencia acústica, materiales, vibración, incertidumbre, …): Norma | Magnitud | Esperado | Calculado | Delta | Estado, donde los valores esperados provienen de los ejemplos resueltos de las propias normas o de expresiones en forma cerrada sintetizadas a un resultado conocido.

Cada sección de dominio es plegable y permanece plegada mientras todas sus filas pasan; una sección con alguna fila fallida se abre sola. En pantallas estrechas las tablas anchas se desplazan lateralmente dentro de su propia caja.

El registro de comprobaciones vive en scripts/conformance_report.py y se ejecuta en local con make conformance. Los valores esperados se toman de las mismas tablas de referencia que exige la batería de tests, de modo que el informe y los tests no pueden discrepar en silencio. Esta página se rellena desde ese mismo documento con make site-reports, y la CI falla si el informe o esta copia suya se desincronizan.

Para la filosofía de diseño detrás de este enfoque, junto con un caso de estudio sobre la ponderación temporal de IEC 61672-1, consulta Por qué phonometry.

Volver a deducir las normas con este detalle también saca a la luz defectos de los propios documentos publicados: ejemplos resueltos que contradicen su articulado, constantes mal impresas, referencias cruzadas rotas. Cada caso confirmado, con su evidencia y lo que hace la librería al respecto, está en el registro de erratas.

427/427 conformance checks pass across 53 domains and 278 standards - filters class 1 - weightings within IEC 61672-1 class 1.

Each row pins a standard clause to its expected normative value and the value the library computes. Every section below is collapsible and stays collapsed while all of its rows pass; a section with any failing row opens automatically.

Numerical validation - filters & weightings: class showcase (IEC 61260-1 · IEC 61672-1 · ISO 7196)

IEC 61260-1:2014 class per filter architecture (order 6, one-third-octave, 100 Hz-10 kHz, fs = 48 kHz). For each architecture the table shows, at its binding band, the measured relative attenuation and the class-1 limit it must clear, so the number and the range it must sit in are both visible. A positive margin means the acceptance limits are met with that much room.

ArchitectureClass verdictBinding bandMeasured rel. atten.Class-1 limitMargin cl.1Margin cl.2
butterClass 1 (default)100 Hz+0.00 dB≥ -0.40 dB+0.400 dB+0.600 dB
cheby1By design (passband ripple)6310 Hz+0.19 dB≥ +1.44 dB-1.246 dB-0.837 dB
cheby2Class 1100 Hz+0.00 dB≥ -0.40 dB+0.400 dB+0.600 dB
ellipBy design (passband ripple)10000 Hz+0.10 dB≥ +1.32 dB-1.218 dB-0.813 dB
besselBy design (soft rolloff)100 Hz+12.46 dB≥ +16.60 dB-4.133 dB-3.133 dB

Only Butterworth (the library default) and Chebyshev-II are class-compliant architectures. Chebyshev-I and elliptic trade the mask for passband ripple, and Bessel for a maximally-flat group delay (soft rolloff); they cannot satisfy the IEC 61260-1 Class 1/2 attenuation mask by construction, so they are labelled By design - this is expected, not a failure or regression.

Frequency-weighting conformance (A/C: IEC 61672-1 Table 3; G: ISO 7196 A.3). The max deviation from nominal is informational (it falls at a frequency extreme where the tolerance is widest and asymmetric); compliance is judged at the binding frequency - the one with the least headroom - where the deviation, the applicable tolerance band and the headroom are shown together.

CurvefsMax dev. from nominal (info)Binding freqDeviation thereTolerance bandHeadroom
A48 kHz-0.867 dB @ 19953 Hz1000 Hz+0.000 dB[-0.70, +0.70] dB+0.700 dB
A96 kHz-0.482 dB @ 19953 Hz1000 Hz+0.000 dB[-0.70, +0.70] dB+0.700 dB
C48 kHz-0.900 dB @ 19953 Hz1000 Hz+0.000 dB[-0.70, +0.70] dB+0.700 dB
G48 kHz+0.047 dB @ 1 Hz1 Hz+0.047 dB[-1.00, +1.00] dB+0.953 dB
Filters & weightings: 100% (10/10)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 61260-1:2014 Table 1Octave-band filter class (butterworth, fs=48 kHz)class 1class 1 (margin +0.400 dB)+0.400 dB
IEC 61260-1:2014 Table 1One-third-octave filter class (butterworth, fs=48 kHz)class 1class 1 (margin +0.400 dB)+0.400 dB
IEC 61260:1995 / ANSI S1.11-2004 Table 1Class 0 (strictest) octave-band filter (butterworth, fs=48 kHz)class 0class 0 (margin +0.150 dB)+0.150 dB
IEC 61260-1:2014 Table F.1Formula (9) breakpoint mapping, b=3, Omega at G**(1/2)1.12202 (+/-0.00001)1.122020
IEC 61672-1:2013 Table 3A-weighting deviation vs class-1 limits (fs=48 kHz)deviation within limits @ 1000 Hz+0.000 dB in [-0.70, +0.70] dBheadroom +0.700 dB
IEC 61672-1:2013 Table 3C-weighting deviation vs class-1 limits (fs=48 kHz)deviation within limits @ 1000 Hz+0.000 dB in [-0.70, +0.70] dBheadroom +0.700 dB
ISO 7196:1995 Table 2 / A.3G-weighting deviation vs +/-1 dB tolerance (fs=48 kHz)deviation within limits @ 1 Hz+0.047 dB in [-1.00, +1.00] dBheadroom +0.953 dB
ANSI S1.4-1983 Tables IV/VB-weighting (historical) deviation vs Type 0 limits (fs=48 kHz)deviation within limits @ 200 Hz-0.049 dB in [-0.70, +0.70] dBheadroom +0.651 dB
IEC 61012:1990 Table 1 / 2.2AU-weighting deviation vs separate-unit tolerances (fs=96 kHz)deviation within limits @ 10000 Hz-0.072 dB in [-1.00, +1.00] dBheadroom +0.928 dB
IEC 537:1976 (withdrawn) via NASA CR-3406 Table SLD-ID-weighting response vs the published tabulated curve (fs=48 kHz)abs(response - table) <= 0.2 dB (0.45 dB at 1600/2500 Hz)-0.131 dB @ 8000 Hz (bound 0.20 dB)headroom +0.069 dB
Levels & dosimetry: 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 61672-1:2013 (Leq)Leq of a 1 Pa 1 kHz sine90.97 dB (+/-0.05 dB)90.969 dB-0.001 dB
IEC 61252:1995 (LEX,8h)8 h exposure to 90 dB(A) noise90 dB (+/-0.05 dB)90.008 dB0.008 dB
ISO 1996-1:2016 3.6.4Lden, constant 60 dB in day/evening/night66.3952 dB (+/-0 dB)66.3952 dB0 dB
ISO 1996-2:2007 Annex C.5 Example 1Tonal audibility ΔLta (Formula C.3), 4 kHz tone13.7 dB (+/-0.05 dB)13.66 dB-0.044 dB
ISO 1996-2:2007 Annex C.5 Example 1Tonal adjustment Kt (Formulae C.4-C.6)6 dB (+/-0 dB)6 dB0 dB
ISO 1996-2:2017 Annex G.2Combined measurement uncertainty u = √(Σ(cj·uj)²)2.18 dB (+/-0.01 dB)2.18 dB-0.002 dB
Room acoustics: 100% (12/12)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Sabine (W. C. Sabine, 1922)Reverberation time T = k·V/A (V=120 m³, S=158 m², α=0.2)0.611825 s (+/-0.000001 s)0.611825 s0 s
Everest, Master Handbook of Acoustics 4th ed, Fig. 7-22Sabine RT, worked Example 1 @ 1 kHz (untreated 23.3×16×10 ft room, SI)3.39 s (+/-0.02 s)3.402 s0.012 s
Eyring (Norris-Eyring, 1930)Reverberation time T = k·V/(-S·ln(1-ᾱ)) (α=0.2)0.548369 s (+/-0.000001 s)0.548369 s0 s
Arau-Puchades (Acustica 65, 1988, Formula 18)T (α=0.5/0.1/0.1 per wall pair, dims 8×5×3 m)0.812147 s (+/-0.000001 s)0.812147 s0 s
Model identity (uniform absorption)Arau-Puchades ≡ Eyring when ᾱ is uniform0.548369 s (= Eyring)0.548369 s0 s
Vorlander Auralization 2e, Eq. (11.38)-(11.39)Image-source direct-sound amplitude 1/(4πr) and delay r/c (r = 4 m)0.0198944 (+/-0)0.01989440
Kuttruff Room Acoustics 6e, Eq. (9.23)Audible shoebox image count up to order 10 (= 1560)156 (+/-0)1560
Kuttruff Room Acoustics 6e, Eq. (4.6)Temporal reflection density dN/dt = 4πc³t²/V (t = 0.1 s, V = 120 m³)42258.2 1/s (+/-0 1/s)42258.2 1/s0 1/s
Bies Engineering Noise Control 5e, Eq. (6.44)Room constant R = Sᾱ/(1-ᾱ) (S = 100 m², ᾱ = 0.2 → 25 m²)25 m² (+/-0 m²)25 m²0 m²
Bies Engineering Noise Control 5e, Eq. (6.43)Critical distance rc: direct field = reverberant field (R = 25, Q = 1)0.160000 (= reverberant term)0.160
Kuttruff Room Acoustics 6e, Eq. (3.44)Schroeder frequency f_s = 2000√(T/V) (V = 200 m³, T = 1 s)141.421 Hz (+/-0 Hz)141.421 Hz0 Hz
Bies Engineering Noise Control 5e, Eq. (6.43)Steady-state SPL Lp = Lw + 10lg(Q/4πr² + 4/R) (Lw=90, r=1, R=25, Q=1)83.7945 dB (+/-0 dB)83.7945 dB0 dB
Psychoacoustics: 100% (12/12)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 532-1:2017 Annex B.2Zwicker loudness N, stationary test signal 183.2957 sone (+/-0.1%)83.2957 sone0 sone
ISO 532-1:2017 Annex B.5Time-varying loudness Nmax, technical signal 14 (aircraft, free field)22.6399 sone (+/-0.1%)22.6399 sone0 sone
ISO 532-1:2017 Annex B.5Time-varying loudness Nmax, technical signal 15 (vehicle interior, diffuse field)9.6059 sone (+/-0.1%)9.6059 sone0 sone
DIN 45692:2009 Clause 6Sharpness of the standard 1 kHz reference signal1 acum (+/-0 acum)1 acum0 acum
DIN 45692:2009 Table A.2Sharpness of critical-band noise at 2.5 kHz (2320-2700 Hz, 4 sone)1.78 acum (+/-0.089 acum)1.747 acum-0.033 acum
ISO 226:2023 Table B.1Equal-loudness contour, 60 phon @ 100 Hz78.5 dB SPL (+/-0.05 dB SPL)78.504 dB SPL0.004 dB SPL
ECMA-418-2:2025 Clause 5.1.8HMS loudness of a 1 kHz / 40 dB tone (c_N=0.0211964)1 sone_HMS (+/-0.03 sone_HMS)0.9843 sone_HMS-0.016 sone_HMS
ECMA-418-2:2025 Clause 6.2.8HMS tonality of a 1 kHz / 40 dB tone (c_T=2.8758615)1 tu_HMS (+/-0.03 tu_HMS)0.9998 tu_HMS0 tu_HMS
ECMA-418-2:2025 Clause 7HMS roughness of a 1 kHz / 70 Hz / m=1 / overall 60 dB tone (c_R=0.0180685)1 asper (+/-0.01 asper)0.9999 asper0 asper
ISO 532-2:2017 Clause 3.17 / Annex B.1Moore-Glasberg loudness of a 1 kHz / 40 dB tone (C=0.0617)1 sone (+/-0.01 sone)1.0001 sone0 sone
ISO 532-3:2023 Annex C.1Moore-Glasberg-Schlittenlacher peak LTL, steady 1 kHz / 40 dB1 sone (+/-0.02 sone)0.9996 sone0 sone
ECMA-418-2:2025 Clause 9HMS fluctuation strength of a 1 kHz / 4 Hz / m=1 / overall 60 dB tone (c_F=0.003840572)1 vacil_HMS (+/-0.01 vacil_HMS)0.9931 vacil_HMS-0.007 vacil_HMS
Speech transmission (IEC 60268-16): 100% (10/10)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 60268-16:2020 A.2.2STI weighting-factor pair (500 Hz + 1 kHz bands)0.398 (+/-0.001)0.3980
IEC 60268-16:2020 A.3.1.2Uniform MTF m=0.5 maps to STI=0.50.5 (+/-0.01)0.50
IEC 60268-16 Annex MFull-STI worked example: printed MTF + speech/noise spectra -> STISTI 0.76 (MTI row of step 4c)STI 0.758 (max MTI dev 0.00)-0.002
IEC 60268-16:2020 C.3.2STIPA direct method, Formula (C.1) signal at m=0.20.3 (+/-0.01)0.2992-0.001
IEC 60268-16:2020 C.3.2STIPA direct method, Formula (C.1) signal at m=0.50.5 (+/-0.01)0.49980
IEC 60268-16:2020 C.3.2STIPA direct method, Formula (C.1) signal at m=0.80.7 (+/-0.01)0.70020
IEC 60268-16:2020 C.3.3Indirect method: exponential decay RT60=1 s vs Schroeder MTF0.5885 (+/-0.005)0.58850
IEC 60268-16:2020 C.4.2Filter-bank slope: +41 dB unmodulated tone one octave below 125 Hzm >= 0.5 (C.4.2 pass criterion)0.98120.481
IEC 60268-16:2020 A.2.2 (audio path)Weighting factors: modulated 500 Hz + 1 kHz pair through stipa()0.398 (+/-0.005)0.3980
IEC 60268-16:2020 A.3.1.2 (audio path)Filter-bank phase: half-octave edge carriers at TI=0.90.9 (+/-0.01)0.8975-0.003
System measurement (Golay / Kirkeby / Mueller-Massarani): 100% (5/5)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Havelock 2008 Part I Ch. 6 (Xiang), Eq. (2)Golay pair: sum of periodic autocorrelations = 2L*delta (L = 4096)0 (algebraic identity, +/-1e-10)00
Havelock 2008 Part I Ch. 6 (Xiang), Eq. (4)Golay chain recovers a delay+gain system IR (noiseless, exact)0 (machine precision, +/-1e-13)00
Kirkeby & Nelson 1999 Eq. (17) / Mueller-Massarani 2001 Sec. 3.1In-band equalization residue equals eps/(H^2 + eps) bin by bin0 (closed form, +/-1e-12)0
Kirkeby & Nelson 1999 (max of x/(x^2+eps) = 1/(2*sqrt(eps)))Out-of-band inverse-filter gain within the regularization cap<= -6.021 dB (analytic cap)-6.034 dBheadroom +0.013 dB
Mueller-Massarani 2001 Secs. 4.2-4.3 (group-delay synthesis)Shaped sweep’s Welch spectrum follows the pink target, in-band0 dB in-band deviation (+/-0.5 dB)0.0652 dB0.065 dB
Intensity & sound power: 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 61043:1994 Clause 5Plane-wave intensity I = p^2 / (rho c)0.00238 W/m^2 (+/-1.5%)0.00239 W/m^20 W/m^2
ISO 3744:2010 Eq. 18Monopole hemisphere recovers LW (r=4 m)95 dB (+/-0 dB)95 dB0 dB
ISO 9614-2:1996 Eq. 12Intensity scan recovers LW of an enclosed source90 dB (+/-0.000001 dB)90 dB0 dB
ISO 4871:1996 clause 3.15 / Annex BDeclared L_WAd = L_WA + K_WA (Annex B, L_WA=88, K_WA=2)90 dB (+/-0 dB)90 dB0 dB
ISO 4871:1996 clause 6.2Single-machine verification boundary L_1 <= L_WAdL_1=90 verified, L_1=91 rejected (L_WAd=90)90->True, 91->Falseboundary L_1 = L_WAd
ISO 3741:2010 Eq. 20Reverberation-room method inverts to a known LW0 dB error0 dB0 dB
Room & building acoustics: 100% (52/52)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 3382-2:2008 5.3.3T30 from a synthetic exponential decay (T=1.0 s)1 s (+/-1%)1 s0 s
ISO 18233:2006 (swept-sine method)Sweep deconvolution recovers a known IIR response0 dB in-band error (+/-0.1 dB)0.0006 dB0.001 dB
ISO 717-1 Annex C, Table C.1Weighted sound reduction index Rw (C;Ctr)Rw 30 (C -2; Ctr -3)Rw 30 (C -2; Ctr -3)sum 31.8 dB
ISO 717-1:2020 Annex C, Table C.2Enlarged range 50-5000 Hz: Rw (C; Ctr; C50-5000; Ctr,50-5000)Rw 30 (C -2; Ctr -3; C50-5000 -2; Ctr,50-5000 -4)Rw 30 (C -2; Ctr -3; C50-5000 -2; Ctr,50-5000 -4)exact
ISO 717-2 Annex C, Table C.1Weighted impact sound pressure level Ln,w (CI)Ln,w 79 (CI -11; sum 28.0 dB)Ln,w 79 (CI -11; sum 28.0 dB)+0 dB
ISO 717-2 Annex C, Table C.1 (covered)Weighted impact level of the floor WITH covering Ln,w (CI)Ln,w 64 (CI -3; sum 30.0 dB)Ln,w 64 (CI -3; sum 30.0 dB)+0 dB
ISO 717-2 Annex C, Table C.2Floor-covering improvement ΔLw and CI,Δ (Formulae (2)/(A.4); CI,Δ from the normative Table 4 floor, not the 2020 print’s misprinted C.2 chain)ΔLw 15 dB; CI,Δ -9 dB (Table 4 reference floor)ΔLw 15 dB; CI,Δ -9 dB+0 dB
ISO 354:2003 Eq. 5/8Sabine inversion recovers absorption area9.212828 m^2 (+/-0 m^2)9.212828 m^20 m^2
ISO 3382-3:2012 Clause 6.2Open-plan spatial decay rate D2,S (-6 dB/doubling)6 dB (+/-0 dB)6 dB0 dB
ISO 16283-3:2016 Clause 3.12Facade R’45 isolates the -1.5 dB incidence correction (S=A)38.5 dB (+/-0 dB)38.5 dB0 dB
ISO 10140-2:2010 Formula (2)Lab airborne R on the ISO 717-1 reference shape -> Rw = 54Rw 54 dBRw 54 dB+0 dB
ISO 10140-5:2010+A1 Annex B, Table B.1Reference elements end-to-end: printed Rw (C; Ctr) of all threeRw(C;Ctr) = 53(-1;-5) / 52(-1;-5) / 33(-1;-2)53(-1;-5) / 52(-1;-5) / 33(-1;-2)exact
ISO 10140-5:2010+A1 Annex C, Table C.1Reference floors end-to-end: printed Ln,t,r,0,w (CI) of bothLn,t,r,0,w(CI) = 72(0) / 75(-3)72(0) / 75(-3)exact
ISO 15186-1:2000 Formula (7)Intensity RI on the ISO 717-1 reference shape -> RI,w = 30RI,w 30 dB (scalar anchor RI = 34 dB)RI,w 30 dB (RI = 34 dB)+0 dB
ISO 15186-1:2000 Annex B, Table B.1Adaptation term Kc: all 21 printed rows; (B.1) reduces to (B.2)max abs(Kc - Table B.1) <= 0,05 dB (1 dp print)0.047 dB (B.1 vs B.2: 4.33e-04 dB)0.047 dB
ISO 10052:2021 Clause 3.6Survey R’ applies the V/7,5 minimum-area rule26.197888 dB (+/-0 dB)26.197888 dB0 dB
ISO 10052:2021 Clause 3.16Service-equipment LXY is the 3-position energy average32.823329 dB (+/-0 dB)32.823329 dB0 dB
ISO 10052:2021 Table 4Reverberation-index estimate (35 <= V < 60, type g)k = [4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 5.5, 5.5] dBk = [4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 5.5, 5.5] dBexact
ISO 717-2:2020 Table 4 / Clause 5.2Reference-floor weighted level Ln,r,0,w and CI (ISO 16251-1 ΔLw anchor)Ln,r,0,w = 78 dB, CI = -11 dBLn,r,0,w = 78 dB, CI = -11 dBexact
ISO 16251-1:2014 / ISO 717-2 Formula (2)Floor-covering ΔLw: zero improvement gives ΔLw = 0ΔLw = 0 dB (ΔL = 0 -> Ln,r = Ln,r,0)ΔLw = 0 dBexact
ISO 16251-1 / ISO 717-2 (Foret et al. 2011, carpet)Measured textile-carpet improvement rates to ΔLw = 29 dBΔLw = 29 dB (paper, ISO 16251-1)ΔLw = 29 dB+0 dB
ISO 10848-1:2006 Formula (14)Flanking Kij (simplified) matches closed formKij = 1.9897 dBKij = 1.9897 dBexact
ISO 10848-1:2006 Formula (12)Flanking equivalent absorption length aj at f_refaj = 1.2661 maj = 1.2661 mexact
ISO 10848-1:2006 Clause 7.3.1Flanking total loss factor η = 2,2/(f·Ts)η = 0.0044η = 0.0044exact
ISO 12354-1:2017 Formula (20) vs Hopkins Eq. 2.201 (6 mm glass)Flanking critical frequency (c0²/1,8·cL·h) vs plate coincidence (c0²/2π · sqrt(m”/B’))2107.4 Hz (+/-1%)2123.5 Hz16.156 Hz
EN 29052-1:1992 Formula 4Apparent dynamic stiffness s’t = 4π²·m’t·fr² (m’t=200 kg/m², fr=25 Hz)4.934802 MN/m³ (+/-0.000001 MN/m³)4.934802 MN/m³0 MN/m³
EN 29052-1:1992 clause 8.2 NOTEEnclosed-gas stiffness s’a·d = 111 MN·mm/m³ (p₀=0,1 MPa, ε=0,9)5.55556 MN/m³ (+/-0.0001 MN/m³)5.55556 MN/m³0 MN/m³
EN 29052-1:1992 Formula 2Floating-floor natural frequency f0 = (1/2π)√(s’/m’) (s’=10 MN/m³, m’=100 kg/m²)50.32921 Hz (+/-0 Hz)50.32921 Hz0 Hz
ISO 7626-1:2011 Table 1 / 3.1.2Closed-form SDOF driving-point mobility peak mag(Y(f0)) = 1/c (c=5 N·s/m)0.2 m/(N·s) (+/-0.000001 m/(N·s))0.2 m/(N·s)0 m/(N·s)
ISO 7626-1:2011 Table 1 / 3.1.2Closed-form SDOF static receptance H(0) = 1/k (k=8000 N/m)0.000125 m/N (+/-0.0001%)0.000125 m/N0 m/N
ISO 7626-1:2011 Table 1FRF reciprocity: impedance × mobility = 1 (at 37 Hz)1 (= Z·Y)10
ISO 10846-2:2008 3.17Transfer-stiffness level Lk = 20 lg(k/k0), k0 = 1 N/m (k= 1 MN/m)
ISO 10846-3:2002 Formula (1)Indirect method k2,1 = -(2πf)²·m2·T (f=500 Hz, m2=10 kg, T=0,01)-986960.4 N/m (+/-0.1%)-986960.4 N/m0 N/m
ISO 10846-1:2008 Table A.2FRF relation k = jω·Z at 250 Hz (krecovered from impedance)1001249.2 N/m (+/-0.0001%)1001249.2 N/m
ISO 7626-2:2015 7.5.2Rigid-mass calibration: accelerance mag(A) = 1/m (m=10 kg)0.1 1/kg (+/-0 1/kg)0.1 1/kg0 1/kg
ISO 7626-2:2015 7.5.2Rigid-mass calibration: mobility mag(Y) = 1/(2πf·m) at 100 Hz (m=10 kg)0.0001592 m/(N·s) (+/-0.001%)0.0001592 m/(N·s)0 m/(N·s)
ISO 7626-2:2015 Annex ANormalized random error ε = √((1−γ²)/(2nγ²)): γ²=0,8, n=75 → 4,08 % (< 5 %)4.08 % (+/-0.01 %)4.08 %0.002 %
ISO 7626-1:2011 Table 1Rigid 1 kg mass at ω = 1000 rad/s: mobility 1e-3, compliance 1e-6 (decades)0.001 m/(N·s) (+/-1e-07%)0.001 m/(N·s)0 m/(N·s)
ISO 10846-3:2002 6.1 Inequality (2)Indirect-method validity limit mag(T) = 0,1 ↔ ΔL1,2 = 20 dB20 dB (+/-0 dB)20 dB0 dB
ISO 10846-3:2002 6.1Model bias at the validity limit: k_ind/k = 1,1 (0,83 dB ≤ 1 dB, 10 % ≤ 12 %)1.1 (+/-1e-07%)1.10
ISO 10846-1:2008 Equation (6)Delivered/blocking force F2/F2,b = 1/1,1 at mag(k2,2/kt) = 0,1 (within 10 %)0.9091 (+/-0)0.90910
ISO 10846-2:2008 / -3:2002 7.6Linearity: ΔLk ≤ 1,5 dB for input spectra 10 dB apart (linear element: 0)ΔLk ≤ 1,5 dB (7.6 c)0 dB0 dB
ISO/TS 7849-1:2009 Formula (8)Calibration L_v from â = 9,81 m/s² at 100 Hz (standard’s EXAMPLE)106.9 dB (+/-0.1 dB)106.9 dB-0.02 dB
ISO/TS 7849-2:2009 Formula (15)L_W from L_v via measured radiation factor = 10 lg(P/P0) (round-trip)84.771 dB (+/-0 dB)84.771 dB0 dB
ISO/TS 7849-1:2009 Formula (12)Impedance term: L_W − L_v = 10 lg(411/400) at ε = 1, S = S00.1178 dB (+/-0 dB)0.1178 dB0 dB
EN 15657:2018 Formula (14)Reception-plate L_Ws = resonant-plate power P = ωη(mS)⟨v²⟩ (round-trip)55.545 dB (+/-0 dB)55.545 dB0 dB
EN 15657:2018 Formula (13)Plate loss factor η = 2,2/(f·Ts) at 1 kHz, Ts = 0,3 s0.0073 (+/-0)0.00730
EN 15657:2018 Formulae (15)/(17) + EN 12354-5 Annex I.3Source conversion chain reproduces Table I.8 (wall, installed)max abs(L_Ws,inst - Table I.8) <= 0,15 dB0.055 dB0.055 dB
ISO 9611:1996 eq. (9)Mean free velocity level (energy mean, v0 = 5e-8 m/s)72.3017 dB (+/-0 dB)72.3017 dB0 dB
EN 12354-5:2009 Formula (19b/19c)Coupling term → force-source limit 10 lg(mag(Ys)/Re{Yi}) as mag(Ys) ≫ mag(Yi)40 dB (+/-0.01 dB)40.001 dB0.001 dB
EN 12354-5:2009 Annex I.3, Table I.9Flushing cistern: four paths + Formula (17) total -> 29 dB(A)max path/total dev <= 0.15 dB; total 29 dB(A)0.055 dB; 29.3 dB(A)0.055 dB
EN 12354-5:2009 Annex I.2, Table I.6aWhirlpool floor component: mobility correction + path 11max abs(dev vs Table I.6a) <= 0,15 dB0.1 dB0.1 dB
Building prediction & uncertainty: 100% (15/15)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
EN 12354-1:2000 Annex H.3Airborne prediction R’w (direct + 12 flanking paths)R’w 52 dB (13 paths)R’w 52 dB (13 paths, 52.17)+0.17 dB
EN 12354-1:2000 Annex H.3 (paths)All 12 printed flanking-path values Rij,wmax abs(Rij,w - printed) <= 0,05 dB0.042 dB0.042 dB
EN 12354-1:2000 Formula (5b) / Annex H.3DnT,w closure from R’w (both H.3 examples -> 54 dB)DnT,w 54 dB (printed 53,8/54,3)DnT,w 53.63 / 54.13 dB-0.17 dB vs printed
EN 12354-2:2000 Annex E.3Impact prediction L’n,w = Ln,w,eq - dLw + K45 dB (+/-0 dB)45 dB0 dB
EN 12354-2:2000 Formula (3) / Annex E.3Standardized impact level L’nT,w (exact 0,032 V form -> 43 dB)L’nT,w 43 dB (exact 42,96; E.3 prints 42,8)L’nT,w 42.96 dB-0.001 dB
EN 12354-3:2000 Annex FFacade airborne prediction (R’tr,s,w / D2m,nT,w single numbers)R’tr,s,w 31 (Ctr -3); D2m,nT,w 33 dBR’tr,s,w 31 (Ctr -3); D2m,nT,w 33 dB0
EN 12354-4:2000 Annex G / Formula (2)Radiated LW of a wall+door segment (side 1, low bands)LW 63/125 Hz [59.8, 61.2] dB (+/-0.1)LW [59.8, 61.2] dB0.038 dB
EN 12354-4:2000 Annex E / Table G.9Exterior level of all four Table G.9 reception cellsLp 36,6 / 28,5 / 44,6 / 37,3 dB (+/-0,05)Lp 36.6 / 28.5 / 44.6 / 37.3 dB0.046 dB
ISO 12999-1:2020 Table 2Airborne band uncertainty, situation A @ 1 kHz1.8 dB (+/-0 dB)1.8 dB0 dB
ISO 12999-1:2020 Annex B, Table B.2One-decimal single numbers Rw / Rw+C50-5000 / Rw+Ctr,50-500057.4 / 56.4 / 51.1 dB57.4 / 56.4 / 51.1 dB+0.00 dB
ISO 12999-1:2020 Annex B, Formulae (B.2)/(B.6)Single-number uncertainties (uncorrelated 0,6/0,8; correlated u(Rw) 1,9)u_uncorr 0.6 / 0.8 dB; u_corr(Rw) 1.9 dB0.60 / 0.79 dB; 1.90 dB-0.00 dB
ISO 12999-1:2020 Clause 8 / Table 8Expanded uncertainty U = 1.96 u (95 % two-sided, Rw sit. A)2.352 dB (+/-0 dB)2.352 dB0 dB
ISO 12999-2:2020 Table 4 / Formula (1)Absorption coefficient +/-U (k=2), reproducibility, 20 x 1/3-oct bandsU(k=2) = [0.33, 0.26, 0.22, 0.17, 0.13, 0.11, 0.09, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.09, 0.09, 0.09, 0.1, 0.11, 0.13, 0.16]U(k=2) = [0.33, 0.26, 0.22, 0.17, 0.13, 0.11, 0.09, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.09, 0.09, 0.09, 0.1, 0.11, 0.13, 0.16]exact
ISO 12999-2:2020 Table 5 / Formula (4)Practical coefficient +/-U (k=2), reproducibility, 5 octave bandsU(k=2) = [0.09, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.1]U(k=2) = [0.09, 0.08, 0.08, 0.08, 0.1]exact
ISO 12999-2:2020 Clause 7, Examples 1/2Single-number U (k=2): alpha_w and DLalpha,NRDalpha_w +/-0.07, DLalpha +/-1.6 dBalpha_w +/-0.07, DLalpha +/-1.6 dBexact
Outdoor propagation & occupational exposure: 100% (10/10)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 9613-1:1993 Table 1Air attenuation @ 10 degC, 70 %, 1 kHz3.66 dB/km (+/-0.01 dB/km)3.658 dB/km-0.002 dB/km
ISO 9613-1:1993 Table 1Air attenuation @ 0 degC, 20 %, 2 kHz34.6 dB/km (+/-0.1 dB/km)34.64 dB/km0.04 dB/km
ISO 9613-2:1996 Table 2Atmospheric attenuation grid, 6 conditions x 8 octave bands, dB/kmall 48 cells within half a printed digitworst residual 0.939 x tolerance0.939 x
ISO 9613-2:1996 Eq. (7)Geometrical divergence Adiv = 20 lg(d/d0) + 11 at 100 m51 dB (+/-0 dB)51 dB0 dB
ISO 9613-2:1996 Table 3Ground b’(0) porous limit -> Agr(250 Hz) = 2(-1.5 + 10.1)17.2 dB (+/-0 dB)17.2 dB0 dB
ISO 9613-2:1996 clause 7.4Single-edge diffraction saturates at the 20 dB cap20 dB (+/-0 dB)20 dB0 dB
ISO 9613-2:1996 clause 7.4Double-edge diffraction saturates at the 25 dB cap25 dB (+/-0 dB)25 dB0 dB
ISO 9612:2009 Annex DTask-based LEX,8h + U (welder day, case a)LEX,8h 84.3; U 2.7 dBLEX,8h 84.3; U 2.7 dB-0.01; +0.02 dB
ISO 9612:2009 Annex EJob-based LEX,8h + U (production line, 18 workers)LEX,8h 88.1; U 3.8 dBLEX,8h 88.2; U 3.8 dB+0.06; -0.03 dB
ISO 9612:2009 Annex FFull-day LEX,8h + U (forklift drivers)LEX,8h 90.1; U 3.4 dBLEX,8h 90.1; U 3.4 dB+0.02; +0.03 dB
Materials: absorption, airflow & impedance: 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 11654:1997 Annex A.1Weighted absorption alpha_w (no indicator)0.60 (class C, no indic.)0.60 (class C, ”)0
ISO 11654:1997 Annex A.2Weighted absorption alpha_w with M indicator0.60(M)0.60(M)0
ISO 9053-2:2020 Annex A.3Thermal boundary-layer thickness b0.00183 m (+/-0.00001 m)0.00183 m0 m
ISO 9053-2:2020 Annex A.3Effective ratio of specific heats kappa’1.37 (+/-0.001)1.370
ISO 10534-1:1996 Eqs (9)/(13)/(14)Absorption from standing-wave ratio s=3alpha 0.75 (+/-0), |r| 0.5alpha 0.75, |r| 0.50000
ISO 10534-2 Eq. (17) / Annex DTwo-microphone round trip recovers a known reflection factorabs(r - (0.3-0.4j)) = 0 (identity, +/-1e-9)00
Scattering & diffusion (ISO 17497): 100% (14/14)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 17497-1:2004 Eq (2)Reference speed of sound at 20 C343.2 m/s (+/-0 m/s)343.2 m/s0 m/s
ISO 17497-1:2004 Eqs (1)/(4)/(5)Scattering coefficient (synthetic chain)0.0931 (+/-0)0.09310
ISO 17497-1:2004 Annex A.5Expanded uncertainty of scattering coefficient0.02971 (+/-0)0.029710
ISO 17497-2:2012 Formula (5)Directional diffusion coefficient (QRD, model arc)0.1099 (+/-0)0.10990
ISO 17497-2:2012 Formula (5)Directional diffusion coefficient (flat reference)0.0049 (+/-0)0.00490
ISO 17497-2:2012 Formula (7)Normalised diffusion coefficient (QRD, model arc)0.1055 (+/-0)0.10550
Cox & D’Antonio 3e App. B (2D BEM)Normalised diffusion d_n, N=7 QRD x 6 periods, 200 Hz band (low-band anchor)0 (+/-0.015)00
Cox & D’Antonio 3e App. B (2D BEM)Normalised diffusion d_n, N=7 QRD x 6 periods, 250 Hz band (low-band anchor)0.01 (+/-0.015)0.001-0.009
Cox & D’Antonio 3e App. B (2D BEM)Normalised diffusion d_n, N=7 QRD x 6 periods, 315 Hz band (low-band anchor)0.01 (+/-0.015)0.002-0.008
Cox & D’Antonio 3e App. B (2D BEM)Normalised diffusion d_n, N=7 QRD x 6 periods, 400 Hz band (low-band anchor)0.01 (+/-0.015)0.008-0.002
ISO 17497-2:2012 Formula (8)Zenith area factor (radians convention)1.57105 (+/-0)1.571050
Cox & D’Antonio Eq (10.3)QRD deepest well depth (N=7, f0=500 Hz)0.196 m (+/-0 m)0.196 m0 m
Cox & D’Antonio Eq (5.8) + ISO 17497-2 Formula (7)Flat-panel predicted normalised diffusion (self-reference zero)0 (+/-0)00
Cox & D’Antonio Eq (5.8) + ISO 17497-2 Formula (7)QRD predicted normalised diffusion at 2 kHz (above flat panel)0.208 (+/-0)0.2080
In-situ road absorption (ISO 13472): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 13472-1:2002 Clause 4.2Geometrical-spreading factor Kr0.6667 (+/-0)0.66670
ISO 13472-1:2002 Annex AMaximum-sampled-area radius1.3425 m (+/-0 m)1.3425 m0 m
ISO 13472-2:2010 Clause 5.4.1Spot-tube upper usable frequency f_u1989.4 Hz (+/-0.1 Hz)1989.4 Hz0 Hz
Precision sound power (ISO 3745 / 9614-3): 100% (4/4)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 3745:2012 Clause 10.5 EXAMPLEExpanded uncertainty U (k=2)4.123 dB (+/-0.001 dB)4.123 dB0 dB
ISO 3745:2012 Eq (11)K1 background floor (6 dB edge band)1.2563 dB (+/-0.0001 dB)1.2563 dB0 dB
ISO 3745:2012 Eq (16)Meteorological C1 at 23 C reference-0.1282 dB (+/-0.0001 dB)-0.1282 dB0 dB
ISO 9614-3:2002 Eqs (5)/(8)/(9)Uniform-intensity LW recovery80 dB (+/-0 dB)80 dB0 dB
Human vibration (ISO 8041 / 2631 / 5349): 100% (15/15)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.8Wk design-goal factor at 6,31 Hz1.054 (+/-0.1%)1.05440
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.9Wm design-goal factor at 1,585 Hz0.9342 (+/-0.1%)0.93420
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table 1Wh factor at the 500 rad/s reference0.202 (+/-0.15%)0.2020
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.1Wb design-goal factor at 6,31 Hz1.054 (+/-0.1%)1.05450
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.1Wb design-goal factors at 1 / 100 Hzmax rel dev ≤ 0,1 %0.0002670
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table 1Wc factor at the 100 rad/s reference0.5145 (+/-0.1%)0.51450
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table 1 + Table B.3Wd factors at the 100 rad/s reference and 1 Hzmax rel dev ≤ 0,1 %0.0001620
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.4We design-goal factor at 8 Hz0.1263 (+/-0.1%)0.12630
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.5Wf design-goal factors at 0,1585 / 0,1 Hzmax rel dev ≤ 0,1 %0.0000980
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table B.7Wj design-goal factors at 6,31 / 8 Hzmax rel dev ≤ 0,1 %0.000010
ISO 8041-1:2017 Table 5 + Annex BAll nine weightings inside the tolerance envelope (318 printed bands)0 bands outside the Table 5 tolerances00
ISO 5349-2:2001 Example E.2.1Single-tool daily exposure A(8)4.1 m/s^2 (+/-0.05 m/s^2)4.14 m/s^20.037 m/s^2
ISO 5349-2:2001 Example E.3Forestry three-task A(8)3.6 m/s^2 (+/-0.05 m/s^2)3.61 m/s^20.01 m/s^2
ISO 5349-1:2001 Eq. (C.1)VWF 10 % lifetime Dy at A(8)=74 yr (+/-0.1 yr)4.04 yr0.042 yr
Directive 2002/44/EC Art. 3HAV/WBV action & limit valuesHAV 2.5/5.0, WBV 0.5/1.15 m/s^2HAV 2.5/5.0, WBV 0.5/1.15 m/s^20
Speech intelligibility (ANSI S3.5-1997): 100% (7/7)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ANSI S3.5-1997 Table 3Band-importance function normalisation1 (+/-0)10
ANSI S3.5-1997 clause 5.4Equivalent masking spectrum level at 200 Hz-1.665 (+/-0.001)-1.6650
ANSI S3.5-1997 clause 5.6Equivalent disturbance in quiet at 5000 Hz-23.6 dB (+/-0.01 dB)-23.6 dB0 dB
ANSI S3.5-1997 clause 6SII, noise 30 dB plus hearing loss 40 dB0.2185 (+/-0.0001)0.21850
R CRAN ‘SII’ Example C.2One-third-octave method, independent oracle0.851375 (+/-0.0001)0.8513750
ANSI S3.5-1997 clause 6SII, standard speech in quiet, normal hearing0.99582517 (+/-0.000001)0.995825170
ANSI S3.5-1997 Table 3Loud-effort speech spectrum level at 1 kHz42.16 dB (+/-0 dB)42.16 dB0 dB
Objective intelligibility (STOI / ESTOI): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Taal et al. 2011 (Eq. 6, degenerate)STOI of a signal against itself = 1 (perfect correlation)1 (+/-0.000001)10
Jensen & Taal 2016 (Eq. 8, degenerate)ESTOI of a signal against itself = 1 (perfect spectral correlation)1 (+/-0.000001)10
Taal et al. 2011 (monotonicity with SNR)STOI rises from -15 dB to +25 dB SNR speech-shaped noiseSTOI(+25 dB) - STOI(-15 dB) > 0.20.462 (0.389 -> 0.851)0
Impulsive-sound prominence (NT ACOU 112): 100% (2/2)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
NT ACOU 112:2002 Formula 1Predicted prominence, OR=1000 dB/s, LD=30 dB11.9542 (+/-0.0001)11.95420
NT ACOU 112:2002 Formula 2Adjustment KI to LAeq at prominence P=109 dB (+/-0 dB)9 dB0 dB
Impulsive-sound prominence (ISO/PAS 1996-3): 100% (2/2)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO/PAS 1996-3:2022 3.5Onset rate of a 30 dB ramp over 0.30 s100 dB/s (+/-0 dB/s)100 dB/s0 dB/s
ISO/PAS 1996-3:2022 Formula 3Adjustment KI of the ramp onset7.1176 dB (+/-0 dB)7.1176 dB0 dB
Room noise (ANSI S12.2-2019): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ANSI S12.2-2019 Table 1NC-40 curve, tangency self-consistency40 (+/-0)400
ANSI S12.2-2019 Table D.1RC-31 Mark II curve, 63 Hz level51 (+/-0)510
ANSI S12.2-2019 clause D.4RC-35 curve, mid-frequency average LMF35 (+/-0)350
Hearing threshold (ISO 7029 / ISO 389-7): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 7029:2017 Table 1Median threshold, male age 60 at 4 kHz20.209 dB (+/-0.001 dB)20.208 dB0 dB
ISO 7029:2017 Table 2Upper spread su, male age 60 at 1 kHz10.153 dB (+/-0.001 dB)10.153 dB0 dB
ISO 389-7:2005 Table 1Free-field reference threshold at 1 kHz2.4 dB (+/-0 dB)2.4 dB0 dB
Measurement uncertainty (GUM / Supplement 1): 100% (7/7)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3-1 clause 9.2Combined uncertainty, additive model2 (+/-0)20
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 Table G.2Coverage factor, p=0.99, v=162.92 (+/-0.005)2.9210.001
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 Annex G.4Welch-Satterthwaite effective dof40 (+/-0)400
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 Annex H.1End-gauge combined uncertainty uc, nm31.71 nm (+/-0.01 nm)31.71 nm0.001 nm
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 Annex H.1End-gauge expanded uncertainty U99, nm92.1 nm (+/-0.1 nm)92.1 nm0.04 nm
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 Annex H.2 (Table H.3)Correlated V/I/phi budget: uc(R), ohm0.071 ohm (+/-0.001 ohm)0.071 ohm0 ohm
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3-1 Table 3 (clause 9.2.3)Seeded Monte Carlo, rectangular sum: 95 % interval endpoint+/-3.88 (u = 2.0)+/-3.886 (u = 2.002)0.006
Noise-induced hearing loss (ISO 1999): 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 1999:2013 Table D.2Median NIPTS, 4 kHz, 90 dB, 20 yr13 dB (+/-0.5 dB)12.9 dB-0.057 dB
ISO 1999:2013 Table D.2Worst-10 % NIPTS, 4 kHz, 90 dB, 20 yr18 dB (+/-0.5 dB)17.8 dB-0.239 dB
ISO 1999:2013 Table D.4Worst-10 % NIPTS, 3 kHz, 100 dB, 40 yr60 dB (+/-0.5 dB)59.8 dB-0.172 dB
ISO 1999:2013 Annex C, Formulae (C.6) to (C.8)NIPTS at 1/2/4 kHz, 90 dB, 30 yr, Q = 10 % (annex inputs)0, 9, 19 dB0, 9, 19 dB0 dB
ISO 1999:2013 Annex C, Formula (C.5)Compressed 4 kHz shift, Formula (1) with the annex’s H = 36 dB13.3 dB (+/-0.1 dB)13.3 dB0 dB
ISO 1999:2013 Annex C, Formula (C.11)Hearing threshold level with age and noise, 1/2/4 kHz mean, Q = 10 %31.1 dB (+/-0.1 dB)31.1 dB0 dB
Multiple-shock whole-body vibration (ISO 2631-5): 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 2631-5:2018 Formula 3Daily acceleration dose, 5 x 40 m/s2 peaks55.97 m/s2 (+/-0.01 m/s2)55.97 m/s2-0.002 m/s2
ISO 2631-5:2018 Formula C.3Stress variable R, Annex C male example1.22 (+/-0.01)1.220
ISO 2631-5:2018 Formula C.5Injury probability, Annex C male example0.37 (+/-0.01)0.37-0.003
ISO 2631-5:2018 Annex C NOTE 5Compressive stress Sd, female example1.4 MPa (+/-0.01 MPa)1.4 MPa-0.001 MPa
ISO 2631-5:2018 Annex C NOTE 5Stress variable R, female example0.97 (+/-0.01)0.96-0.008
ISO 2631-5:2018 Formula 1 vs Annex D Table D.1Seat-to-spine transfer vs the 256 Hz digital filter (0,5-80 Hz)max abs(Formula 1 - filter) ≤ 0,040.0010.001
Sound absorption in enclosed spaces (EN 12354-6): 100% (2/2)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
EN 12354-6:2003 Formula 1Equivalent absorption area, Annex E bare room2.26 m2 (+/-0.01 m2)2.26 m20.003 m2
EN 12354-6:2003 Formula 5Reverberation time, Annex E bare room2.1 s (+/-0.1 s)2.1 s0.003 s
Prominent discrete tones (ECMA-418-1): 100% (2/2)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ECMA-418-1:2024 Clause 10 Formula (2)Critical band at 1 kHz (f1,c / f2,c / dfc)dfc 162.2 Hz (+/-0.05 Hz); edges 922.2-1084.4 Hzdfc 162.22 Hz; edges 922.2-1084.4 Hz0.017 Hz
ECMA-418-1:2024 Clause 11.6 Formula (14)Proximity spacing dfprox at 150 / 850 Hz23 Hz @ 150 Hz; 63.8 Hz @ 850 Hz (+/-0.5 Hz)23.0 Hz; 63.8 Hz+0.004; +0.044 Hz
Tonal audibility (ISO/PAS 20065): 100% (11/11)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formulae (12)-(14)Audibility at 137.3 Hz, Annex E spectrum 14.99 dB (+/-0.05 dB)5.01 dB0.022 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formula (13)Masking index av at 137.3 / 592.2 Hz-2.02 dB @ 137.3 Hz; -2.4 dB @ 592.2 Hz (+/-0.005 dB)-2.017 dB; -2.400 dB+0.003; +0.000 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formula (20)Mean audibility of the five spectra, Annex E6.96 dB (+/-0.05 dB)6.98 dB0.018 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formula (6)Mean narrow-band level LS from spectrum, Table E.149.22 dB (+/-0.02 dB)49.22 dB-0.001 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Clause 6Extended uncertainty U of the 137.3 Hz tone, Table E.22.79 dB (+/-0.02 dB)2.8 dB0.006 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formulae (28)-(29)Extended uncertainty of the mean audibility, Annex E Step 41.38 dB (+/-0.01 dB)1.38 dB-0.003 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formula (8)Tone level LT from spectrum, Table E.167.96 dB (+/-0.02 dB)67.96 dB-0.005 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Clause 5.3.8Tone detection over the spectrum, Table E.1tones at [118.4, 137.3, 158.8] Hztones at [118.4, 137.3, 158.8] Hzexact
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Clause 5.3.8 Step 3Same-band FG combination inside analyze_spectrum, Table E.2 row 2 FG72.15 dB (+/-0.02 dB)72.15 dB-0.002 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formula (17)Multi-tone FG combination, Table E.172.15 dB (+/-0.02 dB)72.15 dB-0.002 dB
ISO/PAS 20065:2016 Formulae (18)/(19)Two-tone separation fD (DIN 45681 Annex J), 137.3 / 212 HzfD(137.3)=24.09, fD(212)=21.0 Hz; Annex E pair combinedfD(137.3)=24.09, fD(212)=21.00 Hz; Annex E pair combinedexact
Psychoacoustic annoyance & fluctuation strength (Fastl & Zwicker): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Fastl & Zwicker Eqs (16.2)-(16.4)Psychoacoustic annoyance, worked (N5,S,F,R) tuple37.0478 (+/-0.001)37.04770
Fastl & Zwicker Eq (10.2)Fluctuation strength of AM broadband noise (60 dB, m=1, 4 Hz)3.6943 vacil (+/-0.001 vacil)3.6943 vacil0 vacil
Fastl & Zwicker Ch. 10 / Osses et al. 2016Fluctuation-strength calibration: 1 kHz / 60 dB / m=1 / 4 Hz AM tone1 vacil (+/-0.05 vacil)1 vacil0 vacil
Electroacoustics: distortion & frequency response: 100% (20/20)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.3.2)THD (rel. total RMS, the R convention the clause defines)0.112853 (+/-0.0001)0.1128530
Closed-form harmonic synthesis (THD_F convention)THD (rel. fundamental, the widespread datasheet convention)0.113578 (+/-0.0001)0.1135780
IEC 60268-5:2003 (20.3/20.4)Characteristic sensitivity level, 1 W into 8 ohm at 1 m (flat 90 dB)90 dB (+/-0.000001 dB)90 dB0 dB
IEC 60268-5:2003 (21.2)Effective frequency range = -10 dB crossings (50 Hz / 18 kHz)50 Hz / 18000 Hz (ref -10 dB crossings)50.000 Hz / 18000.0 Hz-0.000 / -0.000 Hz
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.5)2nd-order harmonic distortion d2 (rel. total)0.099361 (+/-0.0001)0.0993610
IEC 60268-4:2014 (11.1/11.3)Microphone sensitivity level, 12.5 mV/Pa -> 20 lg 0.0125 dB re 1 V/Pa-38.0618 dB (+/-0.00001 dB)-38.0618 dB0 dB
IEC 60268-4:2014 (12.2)Effective frequency range = +/-3 dB tolerance crossings (40 Hz / 18 kHz)40 Hz / 18000 Hz (+/-3 dB tolerance crossings)40.000 Hz / 18000.0 Hz0.000 / -0.000 Hz
IEC 60268-4:2014 (13.2.2)Directivity index of the ideal cardioid, 10 lg 3 dB (11.2.2 a integral)4.771213 dB (+/-0.005 dB)4.771214 dB0 dB
IEC 60268-4:2014 (17.2)Equivalent noise level, 2.5 uV over 12.5 mV/Pa -> 200 uPa = 20 dB SPL20 dB SPL (+/-0 dB SPL)20 dB SPL0 dB SPL
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.7.2 g)Modulation distortion d_m,2 (arithmetic sideband sum over U_2,f2)0.16 (+/-0.0001)0.160
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.7.2 h)Modulation distortion d_m,3 (arithmetic sideband sum over U_2,f2)0.08 (+/-0.0001)0.080
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.8.1 a)Difference-frequency distortion d_d,2 (over U_2,ref = 2 U_2,f2)0.03 (+/-0.0001)0.030
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.8.1 b)Difference-frequency distortion d_d,3 (arithmetic product sum)0.04 (+/-0.0001)0.040
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.10)Total difference-frequency distortion (8 kHz / 11.95 kHz tones)0.03605551 (+/-0.0001)0.036055510
ITU-R BS.468-4 Table 1Weighting network response at the 6.3 kHz peak (14.12.11 network)12.2 dB (+/-0 dB)12.2 dB0 dB
IEC 60268-3:2013 (14.12.9)DIM of the 15 kHz / 3.15 kHz signal (Table 2, 9 products)0.168819 (+/-0.0001)0.1688190
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4eH1 recovers a known first-order IIR gain at 1 kHz0.8954 (+/-2%)0.89540
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4eOrdinary coherence = 1 for a noiseless LTI path1 (+/-0.001)10
AES17-2015 (6.4.2 / 5.2.7)Idle channel noise, 1 kHz -20 dBFS tone (CCIR-RMS -5.63 dB offset)-25.63 dB (+/-0.01 dB)-25.63 dB0 dB
AES17-2015 (6.4.1)Dynamic range, full-scale reference over a -40 dBFS residual at 2 kHz40 dB (+/-0.6 dB)40.41 dB0.414 dB
Calibrated spectral analysis (Bendat & Piersol): 100% (12/12)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (5.67)White-noise autospectral density = sigma^2/(fs/2)0.000977 (+/-3%)0.0009820
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (8.158)PSD random error = 1/sqrt(nd) (Monte Carlo, 100 seeded records)0.1768 (+/-6%)0.17640
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (8.163)95% chi-square confidence interval coverage (Monte Carlo)0.95 (+/-0.025)0.94-0.01
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eqs. (9.55)/(6.39)Coherent output spectrum of a known-SNR path: gamma^2 = SNR/(1+SNR)0.7191 (+/-0.03)0.72550.006
Closed-form power-law slope (10*lg(2) dB/octave per unit exponent)Pink-noise PSD slope over 20 Hz - 20 kHz, dB/octave-3.0103 dB/oct (+/-0.05 dB/oct)-3.0116 dB/oct-0.001 dB/oct
IEC 60268-1:1985 Clause A2.1 / Table AII5 ms burst of 5 kHz tone at 48 kHz: gate RMS = A/sqrt(2) (integral periods)0.707107 (+/-0)0.7071070
Harris 1978 closed form (DFT-even Hann)Hann window ENBW = n*sum(w^2)/sum(w)^2 = 3/2 exactly1.5 (+/-0)1.50
Constant-power 1/n-octave kernel (closed form)1/3-octave smoothed line level = Pdf/(f0(2^(1/6)-2^(-1/6)))0.021592 (+/-1e-07%)0.0215920
Percival & Walden 1993, Table 382Slepian taper concentration lambda_14(31, 8/31), quadruple-precision table0.92943822082 (+/-0.000000000001)0.929438220820
Percival & Walden 1993, Section 7.2 / Eq. (333)Multitaper white-noise density = sigma^2/(fs/2), NW=4, K=7 tapers0.000977 (+/-3%)0.0009630
Percival & Walden 1993, Eq. (369a) tone calibrationMultitaper ‘spectrum’ scaling reads a sinusoid peak at A^2/24.5 (+/-0.01%)4.5000030
Percival & Walden 1993, Eq. (370b)Adaptive multitaper dof -> 2K on white noise (weights -> uniform)14 (+/-2%)13.9847-0.015
Multiple-input coherence (Bendat & Piersol): 100% (5/5)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Problem 7.2 / Eqs. (7.86)/(7.94)Conditioned coherent output of the 2nd input abs(G2y.1)^2/G22.1 = 4/3 exactly1.333333333 (+/-0)1.3333333330
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Problem 7.2 / Eqs. (7.87)/(7.116)Partial coherence gamma^2_2y.1 = 2/15 and multiple coherence = 0.70.7 (+/-0)0.70
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (7.35) with Eqs. (6.40)/(6.41)Multiple coherence of a known-SNR system: gamma^2_{y:x} = SNR/(1+SNR)0.8889 (+/-0.03)0.89130.002
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (7.117)Uncorrelated inputs: multiple coherence = sum of ordinary coherences0 (+/-0.02)-0.0098-0.01
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eqs. (7.88)/(7.121)Output-power decomposition Gyy = sum of Gvi + Gnn (exact)0 (+/-0.000000000001)00
Time-frequency analysis (Bendat & Piersol): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (12.173)Spectrogram of an on-bin tone reads its mean square A^2/2 in every column2 (+/-1e-07%)20
Parseval + COLA identity (Hann taper, 75% overlap)Time-integrated STFT power = time-domain energy of an interior burst0.236151 (+/-1e-10%)0.2361510
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eqs. (11.128)-(11.130)Zoom FFT tone amplitude = demodulate-decimate-DFT chain, machine precision0.7 (+/-1e-10%)0.70
Correlation, time delay and envelope (B&P / Knapp & Carter): 100% (7/7)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (5.21)Cross-correlation peak of a 16-sample pure delay, samples16 (+/-0.001)160
Knapp & Carter 1976, Table I (PHAT) + sub-sample interpolationGCC-PHAT estimate of an exact 12.25-sample fractional delay, samples12.25 (+/-0.005)12.2483-0.002
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (5.101)Cross-spectrum phase-slope estimate of the same fractional delay12.25 (+/-0.001)12.24980
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (8.120)BLWN autocorrelation coefficient at 3 samples vs sin(2piBt)/(2piBt)-0.1559 (+/-0.02)-0.1666-0.011
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Example 8.5Random error of the correlation peak: B=100 Hz, T=5 s, M/S=N/S=100.35 (+/-0.001)0.3493-0.001
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Table 13.1Hilbert transform of cos recovers sin: max interior error0 (+/-0)00
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Eq. (13.27)Envelope of an AM waveform recovers 1 + mcos(2pifm*t) exactly0 (+/-0)00
Cepstrum, liftering and envelope spectrum (Havelock / B&P): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Havelock 2008 Ch. 27 Fig. 21 + Mercator series of ln(1+ae^{-jtheta})Power-cepstrum height at the echo delay = reflection coefficient a0.4 (+/-0)0.40
Havelock 2008 Ch. 87 Eq. (14): complex cepstrum, series term n = 2Second rahmonic of a reflection a = 0.4 equals -a^2/2-0.08 (+/-0)-0.080
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Sec. 13.3 (Fig. 13.11)Envelope-spectrum line of an AM tone (A0 = 2, m = 0.35) at fm0.7 (+/-0.002)0.70
Time synchronous averaging (McFadden 1987): 100% (5/5)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
McFadden 1987 Eq. 8 / Eq. 9: comb filter |C(f)| at a harmonic k/TComb-filter tooth height at a harmonic equals unity (any N)1 (+/-0)10
McFadden 1987 Eq. 8: comb filter one quarter-order from a tooth, N = 2Comb-filter magnitude = 1/sqrt(2) at order 0.250.70710678 (+/-0)0.707106780
McFadden 1987 Sec. 4 (Fig. 5): node selection, tone at 32.05 ordersN = 20 places a comb node on 32.05 orders (|C| = 0), not the power-of-2 N = 320 (+/-0.0000000001)00
McFadden 1987 Eq. 5: exact recovery, integer samples per periodNoiseless periodic waveform (M = 256) recovered to machine precision0 (+/-0.0000000001)00
McFadden 1987 Sec. 1: asynchronous-noise variance reduced by 1/NResidual noise std of the average falls as sigma/sqrt(N), N = 640.125 (+/-15%)0.12414-0.001
Data qualification and Rice statistics (Bendat & Piersol): 100% (8/8)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Example 4.4Reverse arrangements of the 20-observation sequence86 (+/-0)860
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Table A.6Lower percentage point A(20; 0.975) at alpha = 0.0564 (+/-0)640
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Table A.6Upper percentage point A(20; 0.025) at alpha = 0.05125 (+/-0)1250
Wald & Wolfowitz 1940 exact run distributionRuns acceptance region for n1 = n2 = 10, alpha = 0.05: lower point6 (+/-0)60
Wald & Wolfowitz 1940 exact run distributionRuns acceptance region for n1 = n2 = 10, alpha = 0.05: upper point15 (+/-0)150
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Example 5.13 / Eq. (5.195)Zero-crossing rate of bandlimited noise (fc = 1 kHz, B = 400 Hz)2013 (+/-1%)2013-0.551
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Example 5.12Apparent frequency of low-pass noise (B = 2 kHz) = 0.577 B1155 (+/-1%)11593.911
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Example 5.14 / Eq. (5.206)Prob[positive peak > 4 sigma] of a narrow bandwidth record0.000335 (+/-0.00001)0.0003340
Underwater acoustics (ISO 18405/17208/18406): 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ISO 18405:2017 / ISO 18406 Formula 7Sound pressure level of a synthetic tone, dB re 1 µPa123.0103 (+/-0.0001)123.01030
ISO 18405:2017 / ISO 18406 Formulae 3-4Sound exposure level of a 2 s tone, dB re 1 µPa²·s120 (+/-0.001)1200
ISO 18406:2017 (6.4.2.1.3)Peak sound pressure level of a known waveform, dB re 1 µPa129.5424 (+/-0.0001)129.54240
ISO 17208-1:2016Radiated noise level from RMS pressure and distance, dB re 1 µPa·m46.0206 (+/-0.0001)46.02060
ISO 17208-2:2019 (Formula 3)Lloyd’s-mirror surface correction ΔL at a known k·d_s-3.5211 (+/-0.0001)-3.52110
ISO 18406:2017 (Formulae 8-9)Cumulative SEL of N identical strikes = SEL_ss + 10·lg(N)196.9897 (+/-0)196.98970
Underwater sound propagation (transmission loss): 100% (15/15)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Mackenzie (1981) nine-term equationSpeed of sound at 25 °C, 35 ‰, 1000 m (canonical check value), m/s1550.744 m/s (+/-0.01 m/s)1550.744 m/s0 m/s
UNESCO/Chen-Millero vs MackenzieSound-speed agreement at 10 °C, 35 ‰, 1000 m (cross-model), m/s1506.264 m/s (+/-1 m/s)1506.524 m/s0.261 m/s
Del Grosso (1974) vs MackenzieSound-speed agreement at 10 °C, 35 ‰, 1000 m (cross-model), m/s1506.264 m/s (+/-1 m/s)1506.313 m/s0.049 m/s
Spherical spreading 20·lg(R)Geometrical spreading loss at R = 1000 m, dB60 dB (+/-0 dB)60 dB0 dB
Thorp (1967) absorptionVolume absorption α at 10 kHz (cold deep water), dB/km1.1498 dB/km (+/-0 dB/km)1.1498 dB/km0 dB/km
Ainslie-McColm (1998) vs Francois-Garrison (1982)Absorption agreement at 10 kHz, 10 °C, 35 ‰, 0 m, pH 8, dB/km0.9626 dB/km (+/-0.0963 dB/km)0.9866 dB/km0.024 dB/km
Francois-Garrison (1982) Part II Table IVAbsorption α at 100 kHz, 10 °C, 35 ‰, 0 m, pH 8 (printed value), dB/km33.6 dB/km (+/-0.05 dB/km)33.63 dB/km0.03 dB/km
Del Grosso refit (Wong-Zhu 1995 Table IV)c(t90 = 20 °C, S = 35, P = 500 bar) vs the printed check table, m/s1603.679 m/s (+/-0.001 m/s)1603.679 m/s0 m/s
Wales-Heitmeyer (2002) ensemble spectrumMerchant-ship source PSD at 100 Hz (printed equation), dB re 1 µPa²/Hz158.45 dB (+/-0.001 dB)158.45 dB0 dB
Passive sonar equation (Urick/Etter)Figure of merit SL − (NL − DI) − DT, dB85 dB (+/-0 dB)85 dB0 dB
Seabed reflection (Rayleigh, normal incidence)Bottom loss at 90° grazing, sand ρ=1900 c=1650 over water, dB9.0506 dB (+/-0 dB)9.0506 dB0 dB
Wenz wind noise (rule of fives)Wind spectrum level at 1 kHz, 5 kn (canonical anchor), dB re 1 µPa²/Hz51.0206 dB (+/-0.0001 dB)51.0206 dB0 dB
Mellen thermal noiseThermal spectrum level at 50 kHz, 16.85 °C (physical), dB re 1 µPa²/Hz19.3426 dB (+/-0 dB)19.3426 dB0 dB
JOMOPANS-ECHO ship source levelBulker V=13.5 kn L=211 m band level at 1 kHz (File S1 oracle), dB re 1 µPa m161.394 dB (+/-0.01 dB)161.394 dB0 dB
UNESCO sound speed (EOS-80 canonical value)SVEL(S = 40, T68 = 40 °C, P = 1000 bar) vs Fofonoff & Millard 1983, m/s1731.995 m/s (+/-0.02 m/s)1732.004 m/s0.009 m/s
Underwater numerical propagation (modes / rays / PE): 100% (4/4)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Normal modes vs ideal waveguideFundamental horizontal wavenumber kr1 at 20 Hz, 100 m (analytic), rad/m0.077662 rad/m (+/-0.0001 rad/m)0.077662 rad/m0 rad/m
Normal modes vs image-source oracleAbsolute TL at 1 km in the ideal waveguide (converged image sum), dB48.238 dB (+/-0.02 dB)48.239 dB0.001 dB
Ray tracing vs linear gradientTurning depth of a 10° ray, c = 1500 + 0.05z (circular arc), m462.8 m (+/-1 m)462.8 m0 m
Parabolic equation vs free fieldPE transmission loss at 2 km, homogeneous medium (spherical spreading), dB66.021 dB (+/-0.1 dB)66.021 dB0 dB
Aircraft noise (ICAO Annex 16 / IEC 61265): 100% (15/15)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ECAC Doc 29 noise fraction (half path)Finite-segment correction ΔF for a perpendicular foot at the segment start, dB-3.0103 dB (+/-0.001 dB)-3.0103 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 single-event chainSEL of a long level flyover vs the infinite-path limit LE∞ + ΔI − Λ, dB83.444 dB (+/-0.01 dB)83.444 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 impedance adjustment (standard atmosphere)Acoustic-impedance adjustment of NPD data at 15 °C / 101.325 kPa (Eq. 4-6/4-7), dB0.074 dB (+/-0.0005 dB)0.0741 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 reference workbook (segment Λ)Lateral attenuation of a climbing segment vs the ECAC Vol 3 Part 1 workbook, dB6.3769 dB (+/-0.01 dB)6.3769 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 start-of-roll directivity (jet)ΔSOR behind a takeoff ground-roll segment vs the Vol 3 Part 1 workbook, dB0.3196 dB (+/-0.01 dB)0.3196 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 start-of-roll directivity (turboprop)ΔSOR behind a takeoff ground-roll segment (turboprop, Eq. 4-24b), dB1.0943 dB (+/-0.01 dB)1.0944 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 workbook event assembly (JETFDS/R03, behind SOR)Energy sum of the reference per-segment SELs vs the B-1 event total, dB74.73 dB (+/-0.01 dB)74.733 dB0.003 dB
SAE ARP 5534 band-attenuation continuitySAE-Method δ_B at the 150 dB branch split (Eq. 7 vs Eq. 8), dB123.95 dB (+/-0.01 dB)123.953 dB0.003 dB
EASA ANP database round-tripInterpolated NPD level at a tabulated node vs the published ANP value, dB98.8 dB (+/-0 dB)98.8 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 29 NPD interpolationLog-linear NPD level at the log-midpoint distance (Eq. 4-4), dB97 dB (+/-0 dB)97 dB0 dB
SAE ARP 5534 pure-tone coefficient (ISO 9613-1)Mid-band α at 1 kHz, 25 °C, 70 % RH, 101.325 kPa, dB/m0.006186 dB/m (+/-0 dB/m)0.006186 dB/m0 dB/m
ICAO Annex 16 Vol. I App. 2 Table A2-3Perceived noisiness at SPL(b), 1 kHz band, in noys1 (+/-0)10
ICAO Doc 9501 ETM Vol. I Table 3-7Tone correction of the turbofan example, dB2 (+/-0)20
ICAO Doc 9501 ETM Vol. I Table 4-4Integrated-method reference EPNL, EPNdB92.619 EPNdB (+/-0.01 EPNdB)92.619 EPNdB0 EPNdB
IEC 61265:1995 Table 1Directional-response tolerance at 4 kHz / 90°, dB2 dB (+/-0 dB)2 dB0 dB
Rotorcraft noise (ECAC Doc 32 / NORAH2): 100% (12/12)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ECAC Doc 32 atmospheric attenuation (Table 4)ΔLa over a 1 km excess path at 1 kHz vs the NORAH2 guidance Table 4, dB6.3 dB (+/-0.2 dB)6.186 dB-0.114 dB
ECAC Doc 32 spherical spreadingΔLs at ten times the 60 m hemisphere reference distance (Eq. 24), dB-20 dB (+/-0 dB)-20 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 32 ground effect (rigid limit)ΔLg over a rigid surface at grazing incidence tends to +6 dB (Eq. 29), dB6 dB (+/-1 dB)6 dB0.002 dB
ECAC Doc 32 propagation chain (NORAH2 prototype)LA of a single-hemisphere emission vs the NORAH2 prototype single-event history (R22 approach, 223.66 m slant), dB(A)55.87 dB(A) (+/-0.1 dB(A))55.886 dB(A)0.016 dB(A)
ECAC Doc 32 flight-condition interpolation (NORAH2 Eq. 8)Distance-scaled triangle blend of three uniform hemispheres, hand-checked, dB97.0367 dB (+/-0.001 dB)97.0364 dB0 dB
ECAC Doc 32 flight-path kinematics (Eq. 17)Airspeed of a straight climbing track, 40 m/s ground speed at a 5° path angle, m/s40.15279 m/s (+/-0.0001 m/s)40.15279 m/s0 m/s
ECAC Doc 32 retarded time (Eq. 22)Recorded-time delay at 100 m slant distance, r/c with c = 346.1 m/s, s0.288934 s (+/-0.00001 s)0.288934 s0 s
ECAC Doc 32 single event (Eq. 27)SEL − LASmax of a constant-speed level flyover, 10·lg(π·d/V) closed form, dB7.982 dB (+/-0.1 dB)7.942 dB-0.04 dB
NORAH2 guidance mean ground plane (Eq. 36-40)Intercept of the plane fitted to a symmetric 20 m roofline, hand-checked, m10 m (+/-0 m)10 m0 m
NORAH2 guidance mean flow resistivity (Eq. 41)Log-average of equal 1e4 and 1e6 Pa·s/m2 halves, hand-checked, Pa·s/m2100000 Pa·s/m² (+/-0 Pa·s/m²)100000 Pa·s/m²0 Pa·s/m²
NORAH2 guidance diffraction at grazing (Eq. 42)Pure diffraction with the edge on the line of sight, 10·lg 3, dB4.7712 dB (+/-0.0001 dB)4.7712 dB0 dB
NORAH2 guidance screening path difference (§A.4.5)Rubber-band delta over a 40 m hill, hand-checked geometry, m4.2848 m (+/-0 m)4.2848 m0 m
Wind-turbine noise (IEC 61400-11): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
IEC 61400-11:2012 Formula 30Critical bandwidth about a 500 Hz tone, Hz117.255 Hz (+/-0 Hz)117.255 Hz0 Hz
IEC 61400-11:2012 Formula 26Apparent sound power level of a single band, dB re 1 pW148.5139 dB (+/-0.0001 dB)148.5139 dB0 dB
IEC 61400-11:2012 Formulae 31-34Tonal audibility of a synthetic clean tone, dB16.38 dB (+/-0.06 dB)16.38 dB-0.001 dB
Porous & multilayer absorbers (Mechel / Bies / Cox & D'Antonio): 100% (10/10)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bies 5e App. D Table D.1 / Mechel 2e G.11 (2)Delany-Bazley normalised Zc at X = 0.1, real part1.3241 (+/-0)1.32410
Bies 5e App. D Table D.1 / Mechel 2e G.11 (2)Delany-Bazley normalised Zc at X = 0.1, imaginary part-0.4694 (+/-0)-0.46940
Miki 1990 Eqs. (30)-(34)Miki normalised wavenumber at f/sigma = 0.1, real part1.4523 (+/-0)1.45230
Johnson et al. 1987 / Cox & D’Antonio 3e Eq. (6.19)JCA static viscous limit j w rho_e -> sigma, Pa s/m220000 Pa s/m2 (+/-0.01%)20000 Pa s/m20 Pa s/m2
Mechel 2e Sect. D.3 Eq. (1)Hard-backed layer: TMM vs -j Zc cot(kd), max rel deviation0 (+/-0)00
Lossless-layer limit (Mechel 2e Sect. D.3-D.4)Air cavity over a rigid wall at lambda/4: alpha0 (+/-0)00
Mechel 2e Sect. D.5Maximum statistical absorption of a locally reacting plane0.951 (+/-0.001)0.9510
Cox & D’Antonio 3e Eq. (7.9)Membrane resonance 60/sqrt(m d), m = 5 kg/m2, d = 5 cm, Hz120 Hz (+/-2%)119.85 Hz-0.15 Hz
Maa 1998 Fig. 5 / Cox & D’Antonio 3e Fig. 7.28Microperforated panel (d=t=0.2 mm, b=2.5 mm, D=6 cm): peak alpha0.95 (+/-0.05)0.9560.006
Maa 1998 Eqs. (5a)/(10)MPP peak absorption vs 4r/(1+r)^2 with Maa’s printed resistance4r/(1+r)^2 = 0.9490.9560.007
Slow-sound perfect absorbers (Jimenez et al. Appl. Sci. 2017): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Jimenez et al. Appl. Sci. 2017 Eq. (9)Critical coupling: alpha at the design frequency (300 Hz, normal)1 (+/-0.001)10
Poiseuille limit (Stinson 1991)Slit: j w rho_s -> 12 eta / h^2 as w -> 0 (h = 1.2 mm)153.3 Pa s/m2 (+/-0.1%)153.3 Pa s/m20 Pa s/m2
Poiseuille limit (Stinson 1991)Square duct: j w rho -> 28.454 eta / w^2 as w -> 0 (w = 3 mm)58.2 Pa s/m2 (+/-0.2%)58.2 Pa s/m20 Pa s/m2
Program loudness (ITU-R BS.1770 / EBU R 128): 100% (8/8)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
ITU-R BS.1770-5 Annex 1997 Hz sine at 0 dB FS on the left channel, LKFS-3.01 LKFS (+/-0.01 LKFS)-3.01 LKFS0 LKFS
EBU Tech 3341:2023 Table 1 case 1Integrated loudness of the -23 dBFS stereo sine, LUFS-23 LUFS (+/-0.1 LUFS)-22.99 LUFS0.007 LUFS
EBU Tech 3341:2023 Table 1 case 5Gated integrated loudness of the -26/-20/-26 dBFS steps, LUFS-23 LUFS (+/-0.1 LUFS)-22.98 LUFS0.021 LUFS
EBU Tech 3341:2023 Table 1 case 6Integrated loudness of the 5.0-channel sine (Table 3 weights), LUFS-23 LUFS (+/-0.1 LUFS)-23.02 LUFS-0.016 LUFS
EBU Tech 3341:2023 Table 1 case 15True-peak level of the fs/4 sine at 0.5 FFS, dBTP-6 dBTP (+0.2/-0.4 dB)-6.02 dBTP-0.015 dBTP
EBU Tech 3341:2023 Table 1 case 19True-peak level of the fs/4 sine at 1.41 FFS, dBTP3 dBTP (+0.2/-0.4 dB)3 dBTP0.001 dBTP
EBU Tech 3342:2023 Table 1 case 1Loudness range of the -20/-30 dBFS tone steps, LU10 LU (+/-1 LU)10 LU0 LU
EBU Tech 3342:2023 Table 1 case 3Loudness range of the -40/-20 dBFS tone steps, LU20 LU (+/-1 LU)20 LU0 LU
2D FDTD wave simulation (Attenborough & Van Renterghem 2021, Ch. 4): 100% (2/2)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Rigid rectangular box eigenfrequencyMode (1,1) of a 1.0 x 0.7 m rigid box, f = (c/2)*sqrt(1/lx^2 + 1/ly^2), Hz299.06 Hz (+/-1.5 Hz)298.91 Hz-0.153 Hz
Free-field pulse arrival delayProbe-to-probe delay of a pulse over 0.6 m of air, (r2 - r1)/c, ms1.749 ms (+/-0.05 ms)1.756 ms0.007 ms
Swept-sine distortion & phase utilities (Farina / Novak): 100% (7/7)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Farina 2000 / Novak et al. 2015 (Chebyshev identity)3rd-harmonic response H3 magnitude of a cubic polynomial, re a3/40.05 (+/-0.0005)0.050010
Novak et al. 2015, JAES 63(10), Eqs. 18/49Synchronized-sweep phase of H3 (Chebyshev: -sin(3wt)), rad3.1416 rad (+/-0.005 rad)3.1411 rad0 rad
Farina 2000, AES 108th Conv. (THD from one sweep)THD(1 kHz) of the polynomial vs sqrt((a2/2)^2+(a3/4)^2)/(1+3a3/4)0.06149 (+/-0.001)0.061590
Farina 2000 (distortion rejected from the linear IR)THD floor of a purely linear path (gain 0.5), max over 100-2000 Hz0 (+/-0.001)0.000330
Bendat & Piersol, Random Data 4e Sec. 13.1.4 (Hilbert relation)Min-phase reconstruction of a strictly min-phase biquad, max err, rad0 rad (+/-0 rad)0 rad0 rad
First-order allpass closed form (1-a^2)/(1+2a cos w+a^2)Group delay of the a = 0.5 allpass at w = pi/2, samples0.6 (+/-0.00001)0.60
All-pass decomposition of a pure latency (B&P Sec. 13.1.4)Excess group delay of a biquad delayed 7.25 samples, samples7.25 (+/-0)7.250
Spherical ground & barriers (Attenborough / Salomons / Bies): 100% (7/7)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Attenborough 2e Eq. (2.40c) (spherical Q, hard-ground limit)abs(Q) as Z grows large (Rp -> 1 so (1 - Rp) -> 0 and Q -> 1)1 (+/-0.000001)10
Salomons 2001 Sec. 3.4 (two-ray field over a rigid ground)dL enhancement at small path difference (constructive, +6 dB)6.0206 dB (+/-0.1 dB)6.0205 dB0 dB
Salomons 2001 Eq. (D.59) (plane-wave Rp, grazing incidence)Re(Rp) at grazing (hs, hr -> 0, cos(theta) -> 0 so Rp -> -1)-1 (+/-0.001)-10
Salomons 2001 Fig. D.3 (grassland ground dip, sigma = 200 kPa s/m2)Minimum dL for hs = hr = 2 m, r = 100 m (dip near 395 Hz), dB-12.7 dB (+/-0.3 dB)-12.72 dB-0.022 dB
Bies 5e Eq. (5.138) (Kurze-Anderson, N -> 0)Barrier attenuation at the shadow boundary N = 05 dB (+/-0 dB)5 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eq. (5.138) (Kurze-Anderson, large-N slope)Delta(N=10) - Delta(N=1) vs the 10 lg(10) = 10 dB decade growth10 dB (+/-0.5 dB)9.8845 dB-0.116 dB
Attenborough 2e Eqs. (9.19)-(9.20) (rigid half-plane, shadow boundary)Exact thin-screen insertion loss at grazing (field halved, 6 dB)6.0206 dB (+/-0.6 dB)5.7932 dB-0.227 dB
Panel & aperture sound insulation (Bies / Hopkins / Cremer): 100% (11/11)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bies 5e Eq. 7.40 (mass law)6 dB per octave (500 -> 1000 Hz)6.0206 dB (+/-0.01 dB)6.02 dB-0.001 dB
Bies 5e Eq. 7.40 (mass law)6 dB per doubling of mass6.0206 dB (+/-0.01 dB)6.02 dB-0.001 dB
Bies 5e Eq. 7.42 (field incidence)One-third-octave correction 5.5 dB5.5 dB (+/-0.001 dB)5.5 dB0 dB
Hopkins Eq. 2.201 / Bies Eq. 7.3Coincidence frequency, 6 mm glass2079 Hz (+/-3%)2107.3639 Hz28.364 Hz
Cremer Table 5.1Thin-plate point impedance Z = 8 sqrt(B’ m”)2529.8221 N.s/m (+/-0 N.s/m)2529.8221 N.s/m0 N.s/m
Cremer Table 5.1Infinite-beam mobility phase -45 deg-45 deg (+/-0 deg)-45 deg0 deg
Hopkins Eq. 2.229 (Leppington/Maidanik)Radiation efficiency at f = 2 fc1.4142 (+/-0)1.41420
Bies Eq. 7.62 / Hopkins Eq. 4.73Mass-air-mass resonance f0, empty cavity76.9484 Hz (+/-0.5%)76.8521 Hz-0.096 Hz
Bies Eq. 7.64 (double wall)Below f0 = mass law of the combined mass11.6144 dB (+/-0 dB)11.6144 dB0 dB
Hopkins Eq. 4.92 (composite)1 % open area caps R at 10 lg(S/Sa)20 dB (+/-0.05 dB)19.9996 dB0 dB
Hopkins Eq. 4.99/4.101 (Gomperts slit)Transmission maximum at first resonance1544.9615 Hz (+/-15 Hz)1542.9615 Hz-2 Hz
Bending-wave plate-junction transmission (Cremer / Craik / Hopkins): 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Hopkins Eq. 5.12 (identical plates)X-junction corner tau12(0 deg) = 1/80.125 (+/-0)0.1250
Hopkins Eqs 5.12 + 5.6 (identical plates)X-junction corner angular average = 1/120.0833 (+/-0)0.08330
Hopkins Eqs 5.12 + 5.6 (identical plates)L-junction corner angular average = 1/30.3333 (+/-0)0.33330
Hopkins Eq. 5.14 (identical plates)In-line junction tau12(0 deg) = 11 (+/-0)10
Hopkins Eq. 5.7 (SEA consistency)X-junction reciprocity tau_bar_12 / tau_bar_21 = chi1.5 (+/-0)1.50
Hopkins Eq. 5.116 (identical plates, fc_j = f_ref)X-junction vibration reduction index = 10 lg(12)10.7918 dB (+/-0 dB)10.7918 dB0 dB
Atmospheric refraction (Salomons rays / GFPE): 100% (3/3)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Salomons Sec. 4.4 (ray turning height, linear profile)Turning height of a 10 deg ray vs Rc(1 - cos theta0) (circular arc), m26.457 m (+/-0.1 m)26.457 m0 m
Salomons Eq. (3.4) (GFPE vs spherical-wave ground effect, homogeneous)PE relative level at 500 m over grassland vs Weyl-Van der Pol, dB-16.368 dB (+/-0.5 dB)-16.402 dB-0.035 dB
Salomons Eq. (3.4) (GFPE hard ground vs two-ray, homogeneous)PE relative level at 500 m over a rigid ground vs the coherent two-ray, dB5.997 dB (+/-0.6 dB)5.593 dB-0.405 dB
Electroacoustics: 100% (6/6)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Beranek & Mellow 2e Eq. (13.117)Piston resistance R1(x) = 1 - 2 J1(x)/x at x = 2ka = 20.423275 (+/-0.00001)0.4232750
Beranek & Mellow 2e Eq. (13.118)Piston reactance X1(x) = 2 H1(x)/x at x = 2ka = 20.646764 (+/-0.00001)0.6467640
Beranek & Mellow 2e Eq. (13.117) (low-frequency limit)R1 -> (ka)^2/2 as ka -> 0 (x = 0.02, ka = 0.01)0.00005 (+/-0.01%)0.000050
Beranek & Mellow 2e Eq. (4.151)Radiation mass M = 8 rho a^3 / 3 (a = 0.1 m, rho = 1.206)0.003216 kg (+/-0 kg)0.003216 kg0 kg
Beranek & Mellow 2e Eq. (13.102), Table 14.1First directivity null at ka sin(theta) = 3.8317 (first zero of J1)0 (+/-0.000001)00
Beranek & Mellow 2e §4.19 (half-space baffle)Directivity index DI -> 10 lg 2 = 3.01 dB as ka -> 03.0103 dB (+/-0.001 dB)3.0103 dB0 dB
Industrial noise control: 100% (9/9)
StandardQuantityExpected (norm)ComputedΔStatus
Bies 5e Eq. (8.111)Expansion-chamber peak TL = 10 lg[1 + (1/4)(m - 1/m)^2], m = 4 at kL = pi/26.5472 dB (+/-0 dB)6.5472 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eq. (8.111)Expansion-chamber trough TL = 0 at kL = pi (chamber transparent)0 dB (+/-0 dB)0 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eq. (8.44) / Example 8.1Quarter-wave tube tuning f = c/(4 l_e), l_e = 1.516 m -> 56.6 Hz56.6 Hz (+/-0.1 Hz)56.6 Hz0.003 Hz
Bies 5e Eq. (8.46)Helmholtz resonance f0 = (c/2pi) sqrt(S/(l_e V)) (S=1e-4, l_e=0.02, V=1e-3)122.067 Hz (+/-0 Hz)122.067 Hz0 Hz
Bies 5e Eq. (8.73)Side-branch TL = 20 lg abs(1 + rho c/(2 Sd Zb)) (QWT branch, closed form)0.1638 dB (+/-0 dB)0.1638 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eqs. (8.141)/(8.148) (four-pole insertion loss)Insertion loss = transmission loss for the anechoic reference Zs=Zr=rho c/S6.2498 dB (= TL)6.2498 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eq. (8.275) (Wells’ plenum method)Plenum TL = -10 lg[S_out(cos0/pi r^2 + (1-a)/(Sw a))] (S_out=.1,r=1,Sw=20,a=.2)12.8541 dB (+/-0 dB)12.8541 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Table 8.14 (ASHRAE end reflection, flush)Duct end reflection D = 200 mm at 125 Hz = 10 dB (table node)10 dB (+/-0 dB)10 dB0 dB
Bies 5e Eqs. (7.103), (7.111) (enclosure, fully absorbing limit)Enclosure correction C -> 10 lg 0.3 = -5.23 dB as alpha_i -> 1-5.2288 dB (+/-0.001 dB)-5.2288 dB0 dB