<!-- canonical: https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/building/installed-structure-borne/ -->
Source: https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/building/installed-structure-borne/

# Installed structure-borne sound from equipment (EN 12354-5)

**EN 12354-5:2009** predicts the sound pressure level in a receiving room caused
by building service equipment (pumps, fans, lifts, water installations) that
injects **structure-borne sound** into the building. It closes the
structural-vibroacoustics chain: the source is described by its characteristic
structure-borne sound power level `L_Ws,c`, derived from the EN 15657
reception-plate measurement through the Formula (15)/(17) conversion and a
mobility correction (**not** the raw plate-injected level;
see [EN 15657](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/building/structure-borne-power/)); the source and receiver point
mobilities set how much power is actually coupled into the structure, and the
building transmission carries it to the receiving room. The Annex I mobility
correction `installed_power_from_reception_plate` refers the characteristic
reception-plate level `L_Ws,n` to the actual receiver,
`L_Ws,inst = L_Ws,n + 10 lg(Y_∞,i / Y_∞,rec)` with `Y_∞,rec = 5·10⁻⁶ m/(N·s)`;
with the source mobility instead it yields `L_Ws,c` (Annex I.3, Table I.8).

<picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/images/installed_structure_borne_dark.svg"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/images/installed_structure_borne.svg" alt="The EN 12354-5 cascade per octave band: the characteristic structure-borne power level, the installed power level after subtracting the coupling term, the per-path normalised sound pressure levels, and their energetic total" width="82%"></picture>

<details>
<summary>Show the code for this figure</summary>

```python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from phonometry import building

# EN 15657 characteristic source power and illustrative point mobilities.
bands = np.array([63.0, 125.0, 250.0, 500.0, 1000.0, 2000.0, 4000.0])
lws_c = np.array([78.0, 82.0, 84.0, 81.0, 77.0, 72.0, 66.0])
ys = (2e-4 + 1e-4j) * (bands / 250.0)        # source mobility
yi = (3e-5 + 1e-5j) * np.ones_like(bands)    # receiver mobility
dc = np.array([float(building.coupling_term(a, b)) for a, b in zip(ys, yi)])

# Two transmission paths: the excited floor and a flanking wall.
paths = [
    {"adjustment_term": 6.0, "element_area": 12.0,
     "flanking_reduction_index": np.linspace(44.0, 62.0, 7)},
    {"adjustment_term": 7.0, "element_area": 9.0,
     "flanking_reduction_index": np.linspace(46.0, 64.0, 7)},
]
res = building.installed_source_prediction(lws_c, dc, paths, frequencies=bands)
res.plot()   # characteristic and installed power, per-path levels and the total
plt.show()
```

</details>

## 1. Coupling and installed power

Only part of the characteristic power is injected into the supporting element;
the loss is the **coupling term** `D_C` (always positive), set for a point
excitation by the source mobility `Y_s` and the receiver mobility `Y_i`
(Formula 19b):

$$
D_{C,i} = 10\lg\frac{|Y_s + Y_i|^2}{|Y_s|\,\mathrm{Re}\{Y_i\}},
$$

which reduces to `10 lg(|Y_s|/Re{Y_i})` for a **force source** (high source
mobility, Formula 19c) and to `−10 lg(|Y_s|·Re{Z_i})` for a **velocity source**
(low source mobility, Formula 19d); an elastic support adds its transfer
mobility `Y_k` inside the modulus (Formula 19e). The **installed** power level is
then (Formula 18b) `L_Ws,inst = L_Ws,c − D_C`.

The physics behind `D_C` is the classical power input of a point-excited
plate: only the real part of the receiver's driving-point mobility absorbs
power, and the mismatch between `Y_s` and `Y_i` decides how much of the
source's capability ever enters the structure (Hopkins 2007, Section 2.8).
The mobilities themselves come from the
[mechanical-mobility chain](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/vibration/mechanical-mobility/): measured per ISO 7626,
or from the infinite-plate closed forms of
[panel theory](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/guides/panel-sound-insulation/) when no measurement exists. A pump
on a concrete slab is the textbook force source: its casing mobility is
orders of magnitude above the slab's, so `D_C` collapses to Formula 19c and
the injected power no longer depends on the receiver at all.

```python
from phonometry import building

# A near-force source (Y_s >> Y_i) on a concrete floor:
dc = building.coupling_term(2e-4 + 1e-4j, 3e-5 + 1e-5j)
print(round(float(dc), 2))                                          # ~8.5 dB
print(round(float(building.installed_structure_borne_power_level(82.0, dc)), 1))  # installed L_Ws
```

## 2. Transmission to the receiving room

EN 12354 parts 1 and 2 handle rooms excited through the air and by the
standard tapping machine; part 5 covers the sources that shake the building
*directly*: pumps, fans, lifts, whirlpool baths, cisterns and the pipework
that ties them into walls and floors. Once the installed power is in the
structure, several elements radiate into the receiving room: the excited
element itself and every element the vibration reaches across the junctions.
Each excited-element/radiating-element pair `i→j` is a transmission path with
its own adjustment term and flanking index:

<picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/images/diagram_installed_paths_dark.svg"><img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/images/diagram_installed_paths.svg" alt="EN 12354-5 installation paths: a pump on resilient mounts injects structure-borne power into the floor slab, the excited floor radiates into the receiving room below, a second path travels along the slab into the flanking wall, and the prediction cascade runs from the characteristic power to the normalised sound pressure level" width="92%"></picture>

Each transmission path `i→j` gives a normalised sound pressure level from the
installed power, the structure-to-airborne adjustment term `D_sa`, the flanking
sound reduction index `R_ij,ref` (EN 12354-1) and the element area (Formula 18a):

$$
L_{n,s,ij} = L_{Ws,\mathrm{inst},i} - D_{sa,i} - R_{ij,\mathrm{ref}}
             - 10\lg\frac{S_i}{S_0} - 10\lg\frac{A_0}{4},
$$

with `S₀ = A₀ = 10 m²`, and the paths combine energetically (Formula 17):

```python
import numpy as np
from phonometry import building

bands = np.array([250.0, 500.0, 1000.0])
res = building.installed_source_prediction(
    characteristic_power_level=np.array([80.0, 82.0, 78.0]),
    coupling_term=np.array([9.0, 10.0, 11.0]),
    paths=[
        {"adjustment_term": 5.0,
         "flanking_reduction_index": np.array([50.0, 52.0, 55.0]), "element_area": 12.0},
        {"adjustment_term": 6.0,
         "flanking_reduction_index": np.array([52.0, 54.0, 57.0]), "element_area": 8.0},
    ],
    frequencies=bands,
)
print(np.round(res.total_level, 1))      # total L_n,s per band
print(round(res.overall_level, 1))       # band-summed level [dB]

res.plot()   # the per-path and total L_n,s cascade, as in the figure above (needs matplotlib)
```

The `InstalledSourceResult` carries the per-path levels, the total per band, the
installed power level and `.overall_level`, and its `.plot()` draws the whole
cascade.

## 3. The prediction report (`.report()`)

A prediction ends as a *document*. `InstalledSourceResult.report(path)` writes a
one-page PDF fiche, clearly labelled a prediction and not a measurement: a
prediction-basis line naming EN 12354-5:2009, an optional metadata header
(client, source equipment, receiving room, instrumentation, climate, date), a
per-band table (nominal octave/one-third-octave frequency, the installed
structure-borne power level `L_Ws,inst`, each transmission path's normalised SPL
`L_n,s,ij` and the combined total `L_n,s`), the per-path and total `L_n,s(f)`
spectra, and a boxed band-summed total `L_n,s` (dB) with the installed power
total and the path count.

The relevant `ReportMetadata` fields are `client`, `specimen` (the source
equipment), `test_room` (the receiving room), `instrumentation` and the footer
identity `laboratory`, `operator`, `report_id` and `notes`. Supplying
`requirement` adds a PASS/FAIL verdict against a declared upper limit on the
overall `L_n,s` (lower is better). `verbose=True` adds one column per
transmission path (up to five); otherwise only the installed power and the
combined total are shown. `language="es"` renders the Spanish fiche. The basis
strip states Formulae 18a/17 and the prediction disclaimer. Rendering needs the
optional `phonometry[report]` extra (reportlab), plus matplotlib for the plot.

```python
import numpy as np
from phonometry import ReportMetadata, installed_source_prediction

bands = np.array([63, 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000], float)
lwc = np.array([84.4, 82.5, 69.9, 67.6, 61.6, 49.9])   # characteristic power [dB]
dsa = np.array([-13.6, -17.3, -17.4, -20.0, -26.9, -32.9])
paths = [
    {"adjustment_term": dsa,
     "flanking_reduction_index": np.array([43.0, 46, 50.2, 54.7, 64.6, 73]),
     "element_area": 12.8},
    {"adjustment_term": dsa,
     "flanking_reduction_index": np.array([37.0, 41.2, 35.9, 37.7, 49, 57.8]),
     "element_area": 12.8},
]
res = installed_source_prediction(lwc, 16.2, paths, frequencies=bands)
res.report(
    "installed_structure_borne.pdf",
    metadata=ReportMetadata(
        client="Example dwelling refurbishment",
        specimen="WC flushing cistern (wall-fixed)",
        test_room="Receiving room: adjacent bedroom",
        report_id="EXAMPLE-12354-5",
        requirement=45.0,
    ),
)   # overall L_n,s ~ 43 dB -> declared limit 45 dB: PASS
```

The rendered example fiche, regenerated with `make reports`, is kept in the
repository. Click the preview to open the PDF:

[![EN 12354-5 installed structure-borne prediction example report, clearly labelled a prediction and not a measurement: a header with the client, the source equipment, the receiving room and the identity, the octave-band table (63 Hz to 2 kHz) of the installed structure-borne power level L_Ws,inst, the two flanking paths normalised SPL L_n,s,ij and the combined total L_n,s, the per-path and total L_n,s(f) spectra, and the boxed band-summed total L_n,s with the installed power total and the path count, closed by a basis strip stating Formulae 18a/17 and the prediction disclaimer, with a PASS verdict against the declared 45 dB limit](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/reports/en12354_5_installed_structure_borne_example.webp)](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/reports/en12354_5_installed_structure_borne_example.pdf)

*Installed structure-borne prediction fiche (`InstalledSourceResult.report`), an
EN 12354-5 estimate of the normalised structure-borne SPL in the receiving
room.*

## See also

- [Structure-borne sound power of equipment (EN 15657)](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/building/structure-borne-power/):
  the reception-plate characterisation that supplies `L_Ws,c` and the source
  mobility this prediction consumes.
- [Mechanical mobility and the FRF family (ISO 7626-1)](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/vibration/mechanical-mobility/):
  the measured `Y_s` and `Y_i` behind the coupling term.
- [Bending-wave transmission at plate junctions](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/vibration/junction-transmission/):
  the junction physics that carries the installed power to the flanking
  radiators.
- [Predicting Sound Insulation (EN 12354)](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/guides/insulation-prediction/): the
  airborne and impact members of the same prediction family.

## References

- Cremer, L., Heckl, M., & Petersson, B. A. T. (2005). *Structure-borne
  sound: Structural vibrations and sound radiation at audio frequencies*
  (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-22696-3.
  [doi:10.1007/b137728](https://doi.org/10.1007/b137728).
  The source-receiver mobility coupling and the structure-borne transmission
  across junctions behind the coupling term and the path model.
- Hopkins, C. (2007). *Sound insulation*. Butterworth-Heinemann.
  ISBN 978-0-7506-6526-1.
  [doi:10.4324/9780080550473](https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080550473).
  Section 2.8 (driving-point impedance and mobility): the power a mechanical
  source injects into a plate through the source and receiver mobilities.

## Standards

EN 12354-5:2009, *Building acoustics — Estimation of acoustic
performance of buildings from the performance of elements — Part 5: Sound levels
due to service equipment*: the coupling term (clause 4.4.3, Formulae 19a-19e),
the installed structure-borne power level (Formula 18b), the structure-to-
airborne adjustment term (clause 4.4.4, Formulae 20a/20b), and the normalised
sound pressure level per path and its energetic combination (Formulae 18a, 17).
Conformance is anchored on the coupling-term force-source limit and the
standard's own Annex I worked examples: the whirlpool bath of I.2
(Table I.6a: mobility correction and path 11) and the flushing cistern of I.3
(Tables I.8/I.9: source conversion, all four transmission paths, the
Formula 17 total and its 29 dB(A) closure), within the ±0.15 dB rounding of
the printed one-decimal intermediates. `D_sa` and `R_ij,ref` are inputs (from
measurement / EN 12354-1 / Annexes D and F).
