Source: https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/environment/sources/wind-turbine-noise/ # Wind-turbine noise: apparent sound power and tonal audibility (IEC 61400-11) IEC 61400-11 measures the acoustic emission of a wind turbine. This page covers its two closed-form quantities: the **apparent sound power level** referred to an equivalent point source at the rotor centre, and the **tonal audibility** that decides whether a discrete tone (blade-passing, gearbox, generator) is audible above the masking noise. Each is validated against the standard's formulas and a hand-derived synthetic-tone oracle. ## 1. Apparent sound power level With the reference microphone on a ground board at the horizontal distance $R_0 = H + D/2$ (hub height $H$, rotor diameter $D$), the slant distance to the rotor centre is $R_1 = \sqrt{H^2 + R_0^2}$ and the per-band apparent sound power level is $$ L_{W\mathrm{A},i} = L_{p,i} - 6 + 10\log_{10}\frac{4\pi R_1^2}{S_0}, \qquad S_0 = 1\ \mathrm{m}^2, $$ energy-summed over bands (Formula 27). The −6 dB accounts for the ground-board pressure doubling. ```python from phonometry import environment # Background-corrected A-weighted one-third-octave band levels L_p,i (dB). band_levels = [55.0, 58.0, 60.0, 57.0, 54.0] r1 = environment.slant_distance(hub_height=80.0, rotor_diameter=100.0) lwa = environment.apparent_sound_power_level(band_levels, r1) # dB re 1 pW ``` ### Why "apparent" $L_{W\mathrm{A}}$ is written like a sound power level, but it is not one in the ISO 3744 sense of sampling the pressure field over an enveloping surface. The standard collapses the whole machine into an equivalent point source at the rotor centre and asks what power that source would need, radiating spherically, to reproduce the measured level at one downwind ground-board position: by definition it is the power "giving the same sound emission in the downwind direction as the wind turbine". Everything a 150 m rotor does that a point source does not, the vertical and lateral directivity and the blade-passing swish, is folded into the number and evaluated in a single direction; the optional positions 2 to 4 of the plan-view pattern exist precisely to document how the emission varies around the machine. Apparent sound powers of different turbines are comparable because the geometry scales with the machine ($R_0 = H + D/2$, so every rotor is seen under a similar angle), which is the point of the definition, but an $L_{W\mathrm{A}}$ fed into an ISO 9613-2 prediction carries its built-in downwind bias with it. The ground board, in turn, is why the formula subtracts 6 dB: a capsule lying on a hard plate receives a perfectly coherent reflection (pressure doubling, $+6$ dB) instead of the uncontrolled height-dependent interference pattern a tripod microphone would sample (see [the image source behind the ground effect](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/environment/propagation/outdoor-propagation/)). ### Wind-speed bins and standardized conditions A turbine's noise emission rises with wind speed toward rated power, so a single number would be meaningless without its operating point: IEC 61400-11 reports $L_{W\mathrm{A}}$ *as a function of wind speed*. Sound and wind are logged in synchronized 10 s averages, and every period is sorted into a wind-speed **bin 0.5 m/s wide centred on integer and half-integer hub-height wind speeds**, with at least 10 periods of total noise and 10 of background (turbine parked) per bin. The hub-height wind speed itself is preferably not an anemometer reading at all: it is derived from the measured electric power through the turbine's power curve (Clause 8.2.1), the most repeatable proxy for the wind the rotor actually sees, with the nacelle anemometer and a met mast as fallbacks. The measured range must at least cover 0.8 to 1.3 times the wind speed at 85 % of maximum power (roughly 6 to 10 m/s at 10 m height for a large machine). Within each bin the spectra are averaged, interpolated to the bin centre and background-corrected; a total-minus-background margin of 3 dB or less voids the bin, between 3 and 6 dB flags it with an asterisk. For comparability with consent conditions and older editions, Formula (29) also maps each result to the wind speed at 10 m height over a **reference roughness length** $z_{0\mathrm{ref}} = 0.05$ m (a logarithmic wind profile), giving $L_{W\mathrm{A},10\mathrm{m}}$ at integer 10 m wind speeds regardless of the site's actual terrain. The library implements the closed-form quantities of this pipeline (slant distance, per-band apparent power, tonal audibility); the binning, averaging and uncertainty machinery operates on whole measurement campaigns and stays out of scope. So does the IEC TS 61400-14 declaration route, which turns a batch of measured machines into the declared value a planning authority receives. And two things a wind-turbine reader often arrives looking for sit outside IEC 61400-11 altogether: **amplitude modulation** (the swish, folded into $L_{W\mathrm{A}}$ and rated nowhere in this standard) and **infrasound** — optional measurements under 7.2.1 with no rating method attached, so their assessment falls to national guidance. ## 2. Tonal audibility From a narrowband spectrum (1–2 Hz resolution), the lines in the **critical band** about the tone, $$ \mathrm{CBW} = 25 + 75\,[\,1 + 1.4\,(f_\mathrm{c}/1000)^2\,]^{0.69}\ \mathrm{Hz}, $$ are classified into masking noise and tone lines (the 70 %-lowest energy mean, the +6 dB criteria; tone lines must additionally lie within 10 dB of the *highest* line above the threshold, and that highest line is the frequency of the tone, subclauses 9.5.3/9.5.4). The candidate itself must first pass the 9.5.2 *possible tone* screening: a local maximum more than 6 dB above the band energy average excluding the maximum and its adjacent lines. The masking-noise level $L_{p\mathrm{n}}$ follows Formula 31, the tonality is $\Delta L_\mathrm{tn} = L_{p\mathrm{t}} - L_{p\mathrm{n}}$, and the tonal audibility is $$ \Delta L_\mathrm{a} = \Delta L_\mathrm{tn} - L_\mathrm{a}, \qquad L_\mathrm{a} = -2 - \log_{10}\!\big[1 + (f/502)^{2.5}\big], $$ reported when $\Delta L_\mathrm{a} \ge -3\ \text{dB}$; a tone is audible when $\Delta L_\mathrm{a} > 0$. For a candidate between 20 and 70 Hz the Zwicker band above is not what the standard uses: subclause 9.5.3 substitutes the fixed absolute 20–120 Hz band, so `critical_bandwidth` comes back as 100 Hz for every such candidate and the band is *not centred on the tone* — a low-frequency result cannot be reconciled with the CBW formula printed above. Blade-passing harmonics and low-speed gearbox tones live exactly there, so for a wind turbine this is no corner case.

Show the code for this figure

```python import numpy as np from phonometry import environment df = 2.0 freqs = np.arange(50.0, 400.0 + df, df) levels = 42.0 - 6.0 * np.log10(freqs / 100.0) levels[int(np.argmin(np.abs(freqs - 200.0)))] += 22.0 # blade-passing-style tone environment.wind_turbine_tonality(levels, freqs, tone_frequency=200.0).plot() ```

```python import numpy as np from phonometry import environment # A uniformly-spaced narrowband spectrum (2 Hz resolution): a flat 30 dB floor # with a discrete 60 dB tone at 500 Hz. frequencies = np.arange(440.0, 562.0, 2.0) levels = np.full(frequencies.size, 30.0) levels[np.argmin(np.abs(frequencies - 500.0))] = 60.0 res = environment.wind_turbine_tonality(levels, frequencies) print(res.tone_frequency, res.tonality, res.tonal_audibility, res.is_audible) res.plot() # spectrum + critical band + masking level (needs matplotlib) ``` `wind_turbine_tonality` returns a `WindTurbineTonalityResult` with the `critical_bandwidth`, `tone_level`, `masking_level`, `tonality`, `audibility_criterion`, `tonal_audibility`, `is_audible` and `has_identified_tone`. When the candidate fails the 9.5.2 screening or no line classifies as "tone", `has_identified_tone` is `False`: the numeric fields are non-standard fallbacks and such spectra must be **excluded** from the 9.5.1 energy averaging of $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ over the spectra of a wind-speed bin (`is_audible` also requires an identified tone). The tone frequency and the $L_\mathrm{a}$ criterion anchor to the highest classified tone line, not the probed candidate. The audibility formula is the ISO 1996-2 Annex C one; what is specific to IEC 61400-11 is the determination of the tone and masking levels and the Zwicker critical band from the spectrum. IEC 61400-11 itself stops at $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ and prescribes no rating adjustment. The 9.5.1 energy average over the spectra of a wind-speed bin is a *mean* audibility, the quantity ISO 1996-2:2017 Table J.1 was written for (`tonal_adjustment_from_mean_audibility`, integer 0–6 dB); the piecewise (C.4)–(C.6) law of `tonal_adjustment` applies to a single spectrum's $\Delta L_\mathrm{ta}$, and the two differ by 1 to 2 dB on the same input. ### Assessment report (`.report()`) Tonal audibility is the part of a wind-turbine assessment that ends in a document handed to a regulator, so the result renders one. `WindTurbineTonalityResult.report(path)` writes a one-page fiche following IEC 61400-11:2012+A1:2018 subclauses 9.5.2 to 9.5.8: a standard-basis line, an optional metadata header (source/situation, client, measurement position, instrumentation, date), the critical-band analysis table — tone frequency, critical bandwidth, tone level $L_{p\mathrm{t}}$, masking-noise level $L_{p\mathrm{n}}$, tonality $\Delta L_\mathrm{tn}$, audibility criterion $L_\mathrm{a}$ and tonal audibility $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ — beside the narrowband spectrum with the critical band, the masking level and the tone marked, then the boxed $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ with the tone frequency and the audibility decision, an optional PASS/FAIL row, a note on how $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ is built, and the fixed disclaimer in the footer. A supplied `requirement` is the **maximum acceptable** tonal audibility in dB, so a *less* audible tone passes. Rendering needs reportlab and, for the embedded figure, matplotlib (`pip install "phonometry[report,plot]"`); only `engine="reportlab"` is supported, and `language="es"` renders a Spanish fiche. ```python from phonometry import ReportMetadata # The 500 Hz gearbox tone over the flat 30 dB floor of the snippet above. res.report( "tonality_fiche.pdf", metadata=ReportMetadata( specimen="Horizontal-axis wind turbine, gearbox tone", measurement_standard="IEC 61400-11", laboratory="Phonometry Reference Laboratory", requirement=6.0, # maximum acceptable tonal audibility (dB) ), ) # tonal audibility (dB) and the decision ``` [](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmrplens/phonometry/main/.github/reports/iec61400_wind_turbine_tonality_example.pdf) *Wind-turbine tonal-audibility fiche (`WindTurbineTonalityResult.report`): a 30 dB masking floor under a 60 dB tone leaves $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ = 16.4 dB, far past the 0 dB audibility line and past a 6 dB acceptance requirement.* ## See also - [Environmental noise levels](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/environment/assessment/environmental-levels/): the ISO 1996-2 rating adjustment this page's $\Delta L_\mathrm{a}$ feeds. - [Tone audibility](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/perception/psychoacoustics/tone-audibility/): the same tonal-audibility idea outside the wind-turbine context. - [Outdoor Sound Propagation](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/environment/propagation/outdoor-propagation/): the chain that carries $L_{W\mathrm{A}}$ from the rotor to a dwelling. - API reference: [`environment.sources.wind_turbine`](https://jmrplens.github.io/phonometry/reference/api/environment/wind-turbine/). ## References - International Electrotechnical Commission. (2018). *Wind turbines — Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques* (IEC 61400-11:2012+AMD1:2018 CSV). [IEC webstore](https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/63367). The implemented edition: the measurement geometry of section 1, the wind-speed binning and the tonal-audibility chain of section 2. - International Electrotechnical Commission. (2005). *Wind turbines — Part 14: Declaration of apparent sound power level and tonality values* (IEC TS 61400-14:2005). [IEC webstore](https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/5432). How a manufacturer turns IEC 61400-11 measurements of a batch of turbines into declared values with a stated uncertainty, the number a planning authority actually receives. - International Organization for Standardization. (2017). *Acoustics — Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise — Part 2: Determination of sound pressure levels* (ISO 1996-2:2017). [iso.org catalogue](https://www.iso.org/standard/59766.html). The tonal-audibility criterion the IEC method reuses comes from the Annex C of its 2007 edition (the 2017 edition carries the tonal methods in Annexes J and K), and its Table J.1 mapping, `tonal_adjustment_from_mean_audibility`, consumes the bin-mean audibility. ## Standards IEC 61400-11:2012+A1:2018, *Wind turbines — Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques*: the apparent sound power level (Formula 26), the critical bandwidth (Formula 30), the masking-noise level (Formula 31) and the tonality/audibility (Formulae 32–34). The tonal-audibility formula coincides with ISO 1996-2 Annex C. The full measurement pipeline (wind-speed binning, regression to standardised speeds and the uncertainty budgets) is out of scope here; these are the underlying closed forms.